0
What is the division of the national government into three branches instead of one?
Various political thinkers have distinguished types of government activity. Montesquieu was the first, however, to urge the creation of three separate institutions or divisions of government - the executive, legislative, and judicial - a distinction that became common in almost all modern constitutions. Some governmental structures, notably that of the United States, are based on the principle of separation of powers at nearly every level. Executive, legislative, and judicial powers are divided into three branches of government, creating a system of checks and balances among them and helping to protect citizens from arbitrary and capricious actions on the part of any of the three branches. Such protection is crucial in the area of civil rights - those constitutionally guaranteed rights that shield the citizen from tyrannical actions by government. Often, in times of grave national emergency, when the central government needs more power, the public is willing to grant it. The executive branch usually predominates at such time. Proponents of the separation of powers bring an additional argument in its favor: they point out that the system diminishes the influence of special-interest groups over any one branch of government or over the government as a whole. It is difficult for even the strongest faction to dominate a government in which the executive is elected by the entire population, members of the legislature represent different geographical constituencies, and the judges are appointed by the executive with the approval of the legislature. Not all states, of course, have such clear divisions of government, nor do divisions necessarily guarantee personal liberties. Parliamentary democratic systems, for example, tend to merge legislative and executive functions yet control the exercise of power by constitutional methods of sharing it. Authoritarian states may, however, be constitutionally bound to have separate organs of government yet actually concentrate power in the executive.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why is Jose rizal national hero?
Because he fought the Spanish colony in a unique way not using arms and weapons. instead he used pen and paper and wrote novels stating how the Filipinos are treated by the Spanish government.
What did mcculloch v Maryland and gibbons v ogden have in common?
They both gave more power to the federal government instead of the individual states
Why is the national government considered more powerful that the state governments?
The national government's power is greater than that of any individual state. This was made to have one unified country. Before the Constitution was created, there was the Articles of Confederation. This document gave immense power to the states because the colonists feared if they created a strong central government, that they would have another King George III. However, this plan proved to not be the best as it felt as if there were 13 different countries instead of one. The founding fathers then got back together to create a better constitution, and they came up with the Constitution. This piece of work proved to be an excellent form of government that has influenced countless other nations in the world today. However, the major difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution is that the Constitution gave direct power to the national government instead of the states.
How they choose Jose Rizal as the national hero?
They chose Jose Rizal instead of Andres Bonifacio because he fought the Spaniards not by his sword but by his words. He used his intelligence to free the Filipinos.
How did Harding and Coolidge Support Big Business?
Taxes were lowered to give incentives to business, and government sat back and relaxed instead of worrying about business or taxing so it could get money. That's why our government has NO MONEY!They lowered taxes on businesses so businesses would get more money and the government wouldn’t have a tough time regulating the money businesses make, and because the government wasn’t making money from taxes, the government doesn’t have any money.
What did the founders do when the Articles of Confederation failed?
they were so tired of the weaknesses, so they gathered up in Philadelphia in 1787 for the constitution convention, and wrote a new constitution that established a national government with three branches, instead of revising it.
Why did delegates settle on a federal form of government instead of a system in which power was not divided between state and national governments?
The delegates settled on a federal form of government instead of a system in which power was not divided between state and national government because they believed that it provided for a much stronger national government with a chief executive (the president), courts, and taxing powers.
Why did the framers create three branches instead of one?
A concern that one branch of the government would override if no one was powerful enough to keep them in check was why a three branch government was implemented.
How is the concept of separation of powers clearly established?
In government, there are now three branches consisting of legislative, executive, and judicial due to the separation of powers, instead of having one overpowered branch of government.
How did all 3 branches of government contribute to nationalism and stronger central government?
I think that if your gonna look something up that specific, your should ask someone next to you instead. Your in Mr. Burchetts class for pete's sake.
Which level of taxonomy is used instead od phylum for plants and fungi?
Division is used instead of phylum for plants and fungi in taxonomy.
What does the term federal government refers to?
The federal government is the body that governs the whole country instead of just a state. The federal government is like a big umbrella over the whole country.
What were the key points that the federalist papers tried to convince people of?
First, the authors explained that a strong government was needed for a variety of reasons, but especially if the United States was to be able to act effectively in foreign affairs. Second, they tried to convince readers that because of the "separation" of powers in the central government, there was little chance of the national government evolving into a tyrannical power. Instead of growing ever stronger, the separate branches would provide checks and balances against each other so that none could rise to complete dominance.
Who did the 105th field artillery serve with during ww1?
The 105th field artillery of the 27th NY National Guard served under the 33rd Division and the 79th Division during WWi. The entire 52nd Field Artillery Brigade of the 27th was detached at the beginning of their tour, and never served with their Division. Instead, they were in the Meuse-Argonne Offensive under the French and then American Armies.
What were the two key points that the Federalist Papers tried to convince people of?
First, the authors explained that a strong government was needed for a variety of reasons, but especially if the United States was to be able to act effectively in foreign affairs. Second, they tried to convince readers that because of the "separation" of powers in the central government, there was little chance of the national government evolving into a tyrannical power. Instead of growing ever stronger, the separate branches would provide checks and balances against each other so that none could rise to complete dominance.
Should somalia have an anarchy?
No. History has repeatedly shown that without a strong national government, people cannot be guaranteed their basic rights. So, anarchy would not be a solution for Somalia.Further, Somalia has never been in anarchy. While Somalia comes close to being an anarchy because the national government cannot extend its power to the entire territory. The territory instead has innumerable local warlords who actively contest the authority of the national government. However, the presence of these warlords serves to be a form of recognized government, which is why Somalia is more properly classified as a failed state (a state where the national government cannot compete with local warlords to the extent that the local warlords control more than the national government).
What is considered public property?
Public property is anything not owned by an individual but instead owned by a local, state or national government. An example would be the White House, which is not owned by the President but by the government. Another example would be parks, which are usually owned by local or state government.
