bill
In the U.S.A and in the earlier 13 colonies slave owners gave their slaves Christian names, like Peter, Paul, etc., or names from the classics, and sometimes just regular English names. African slaves were not generally allowed to keep their birth names that they would have been known as prior to being enslaved, because they were very foreign to the owners who did not want slaves with difficult to remember names. Surnames were often not given to slaves for social reasons. If a slave owner had fathered a child with one of his slaves the child would be considered a slave as well, and the slave owner would usually deny any relation to the child. When the slaves were emancipated, or when they escaped, in some cases they would adopt the surname of their former master. NOTE: This answer regards Slavery in the Unites States.
Desperation
Phillis
What is the source of cotton ? What are the merits of cotton? What are the demerits of cotton?
Yes, slaves did have names, but they were often given by their owners and not of their own choosing. Many slaves were given European or biblical names, while some retained African names or adopted new names later in life.
me
Slaves typically had traditional African names given to them by their parents, but slave owners often Anglicized or changed their names to suit their preferences. Some slaves were given names based on the region they were from in Africa or after famous figures. Many slaves also adopted surnames of their masters, leading to a mix of African and European names.
The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.
Wenches
bill
Historical records do not provide specific information about the names of individual Viking slaves. Slaves in Viking society were typically prisoners of war or individuals captured during raids, and their names were not always recorded.
Slaves often received names from their slave owners or were given names based on common naming conventions of the time. These names were used to identify and reference the slaves, further dehumanizing them and reinforcing their status as property.
John Adams did not own any slaves.
Slaves were often given names by their owners, which could be based on personal preference, culture, family names, or even derived from classical literature or mythology. In some cases, slaves were also given names based on physical attributes, skills, or the region they were from. Additionally, some slaves might have retained names from their native languages or tribes.
He owned two slaves, George and King
slaves