becuz they were being taxed so much already that the stamp act made them mad that the british monarch was abusing its power. also with the stamp act, the british was trying to push its debt onto the colonist by trying to make them pay for it
because they were charging other things and it was getting out of control
they were already being taxed
the stamp act was most succeful
Not at all!
British Parliament and the colonists
the stamp act
the colonists shouldnt have to feel that their freedom was threatened
they were already being taxed
by protesting.
stamp act
the colonists had dumped tea into the Boston harbor protesting the tax on tea
The fundamental reason the colonists revolted was taxation without representation.
King George repealed the Stamp Act in 1776. He repealed this act for many reasons. One reason was because the King noticed that the colonists were protesting. Samuel Adams led a mob, that protested against the Stamp Act. The Sons of Liberty (a group of people who hated the Stamp act) tar'd and feather'd the tax collectors and burned the taxes and the tax collectors homes.
the act was taxation without representation
1765 The Stamp ActBoycotting taxed products deprived the Crown of the intended revenue.
The British government took away the stamp act because the Colonists were protesting. The colonists started to destroy lots of things until they found their way. They captured British stamp makers and killed them. The colonists started boycotts against British goods. Then, the British merchants started to complain to king George about how their not going to do business anymore. So, king George took away the stamp act.
The Colonists feared the Stamp Act because they did not have much money, and because the Stamp Act was based on many of the Colonists daily uses.
Massachusetts
Patrick Henry