In the 19th century, the North's economy was characterized by industrialization, with a focus on manufacturing, trade, and a growing workforce that included immigrants. This led to urbanization and a diverse economy that included agriculture but was not solely reliant on it. In contrast, the South's economy was predominantly agrarian, relying heavily on plantation agriculture and the cultivation of cash crops like cotton, which depended on slave labor. This fundamental economic disparity contributed to significant social and political tensions between the two regions.
South enslaved North no
south wont slaves the north did not
the South had more political and economic power in Congress.
It had strong economic ties with the North and the South
Slaves were only in the south. None in the north.
The North and the south were separated into to different societies and had different economic systems
India's division into north and south has historical, cultural, and linguistic roots. Geographically, the Himalayas separate the north from the south, leading to distinct climatic zones and lifestyles. Culturally, different regions developed unique traditions, languages, and religions, influenced by various historical invasions and migrations. Additionally, the diverse socio-economic conditions have further reinforced this division, creating a rich tapestry of regional identities within the country.
South enslaved North no
They had different features, economic status and culture. Due to this they split up.
The North had the greater economic resources as it was industrialised while the South relayed on a slave and cotton economy.
what is local economic development in the north and south according to capstone studies 2011
south wont slaves the north did not
Slavery was a big issue between the north and the south.
i dont know? who would except for einstein.
NO. Only North Korea is. South Korea is capitalist.
There was a large manufacturing base in the North. In the South, it's the industry is mostly agriculture.
North Korea's economic system is restricted due to it's communist form of government. South Korea's economic performance has no restrictions.