gun-making
they both learned equaly
That is a man who has learned a particular trade and works at it.
because they din't have sewing machines back then. Most dressmakers learned to sew or weave from their mother or grandmother.
Colonial children learned to read by using "The Hornbook." The hornbook was used for instruction. Usually it contained the alphabet, a syllabary, numerals, and the Lord's Prayer. Hornbooks contained printed sheets of text, that was mounted on wood and covered with translucent animal horn, which was used to teach reading and numbers. The books were in the shape of a paddle. These tools for learning remained popular into the 1700's, when the battledore, a lesson book made up of folded paper or cardboard, became more prevalent. Like hornbooks, battledores usually contained the alphabet, numerals, proverbs or prayers.
They became apprentices for people who already knew the trade. They could also learn from their family.
In colonial America, it typically took a cooper around seven years to become a master craftsman. This apprenticeship period involved extensive training under a skilled master cooper, during which the apprentice learned the necessary skills and techniques. After completing their apprenticeship, they could apply for master status, which often required demonstrating their craftsmanship through the creation of a master piece.
True "e2020"
A colonial shoemaker typically underwent an apprenticeship, which could last several years, during which they learned the trade under the guidance of an experienced craftsman. They acquired skills in measuring feet, selecting appropriate materials, and mastering various techniques for crafting footwear, including stitching and fitting. Knowledge of different styles and types of shoes, along with an understanding of leatherworking, was also essential. Additionally, apprentices learned about customer service and managing a small business, as many shoemakers operated their own shops.
In colonial times, a young man typically learned a trade through an apprenticeship system. He would often enter into a contract with a skilled tradesman, agreeing to work for a set number of years in exchange for training, food, and lodging. During this period, the apprentice would gain hands-on experience and knowledge of the trade, eventually becoming a journeyman and, later, a master craftsman. This system allowed for the transfer of skills and knowledge from one generation to the next.
they both learned equaly
When describing specialized training, apprenticeship skills, and extracurricular activities, focus on those most relevant to the position you're applying for. Highlight specific skills or knowledge gained and how they enhance your qualifications. Use concrete examples to demonstrate your commitment and ability to apply what you've learned in real-world scenarios. Emphasize teamwork, leadership, or problem-solving experiences that showcase your readiness for the role.
The medieval shoemakers came in two types. One was the cobbler, who repaired shoes and made sturdy shoes for peasants, the other was the cordwainer, who made luxury shoes. Cobblers probably learned their trade from parents or other relatives. They were likely to be itinerant, and moved about the countryside finding work. Cordwainers learned their trade by apprenticeship, and became guild members by working through long years of training.
It means, "Ha, ha! A little apprenticeship." The 'apprenticeship' part could be construed as "A little [primary] lesson learned."
During colonial times, a young person who learned a job from a more experienced person was called an apprentice.
That is a man who has learned a particular trade and works at it.
A jewelry designer apprenticeship typically lasts between one to three years, depending on the program and the depth of training involved. During this time, apprentices gain hands-on experience in various aspects of jewelry design, including metalworking, stone setting, and design techniques. The duration can also vary based on the apprentice’s pace, the complexity of the skills being learned, and the specific requirements of the mentor or institution.
No, based on my experience and what the programs are designed for, the opposite is usually true. On-the-job training (OJT) is typically much shorter than a formal Apprenticeship Training Program. My own career path is a testament to this. Years ago, I was hired for a retail management role that provided on-the-job training. For about six weeks, I shadowed the outgoing manager. I learned our store's specific software, daily routines, and inventory processes. It was practical and focused entirely on performing that specific job. After that period, I was considered fully trained for my duties. Later in my career, I switched to a technical trade and entered a completely different system: an Apprenticeship Training Program. The difference was stark. Instead of a few weeks, this was a multi-year commitment with a structured curriculum. While I was working and earning a wage, a significant portion of my time—a minimum of 20%—was dedicated to "off-the-job" training. This wasn't just learning one company's methods; it involved classroom instruction at a college, completing written assignments, and learning the underlying theory of my trade to earn an industry-wide recognized qualification. So, from a time perspective, there's simply no comparison. General on-the-job training is often measured in weeks or months, tailored for immediate role proficiency. In contrast, an Apprenticeship Training Program is designed for deep, comprehensive mastery, commonly taking anywhere from one year to as long as six years to complete, especially for advanced or degree-level programs. The goal of an apprenticeship is to create a journey-level professional, which logically requires a much greater investment of time. In short, if you're comparing durations, an Apprenticeship Training Program will almost always require more time. OJT gets you ready for a job quickly, while an Apprenticeship Training Program builds a foundational career over years.