The South faced more difficulty rebuilding after the Civil War compared to the North. The Southern economy was devastated, infrastructure was destroyed, and the social fabric was disrupted due to the abolition of slavery. Additionally, the South struggled with political challenges during Reconstruction, including resistance to federal policies aimed at integration and civil rights for freed slaves. In contrast, the North, having experienced less physical destruction, was able to recover more quickly and effectively.
The South.
The former Confederate States, that is the South.
The South definitely came off worse - the entire city of Atlanta was burnt to the ground. There was only one notable battle fought in the North, and as such it did not suffer as much damage as the South did. No need to be mean.
The South had more people and money. The North had technology and organization.
The North - very much so.
The South.
The South.
The former Confederate States, that is the South.
The north side
The South definitely came off worse - the entire city of Atlanta was burnt to the ground. There was only one notable battle fought in the North, and as such it did not suffer as much damage as the South did. No need to be mean.
The South definitely came off worse - the entire city of Atlanta was burnt to the ground. There was only one notable battle fought in the North, and as such it did not suffer as much damage as the South did. No need to be mean.
I believe you're referring to the american civil war in which the North had more factories and the south had more farms.
The Union.
Sounds like the caliber on the drivers' side needs rebuilding.
The South had more people and money. The North had technology and organization.
The north had more deaths but had more people to force the surrender
no difference