Jim Lane was a staunch opponent of slavery and supported the abolitionist side of the debate. As a prominent Free-State advocate in Kansas, he fought against the expansion of slavery into new territories. Lane was also a member of the Republican Party, which was founded on the principles of halting the spread of slavery. His political actions and rhetoric consistently aligned with the fight for freedom and equality.
He was against slavery, because he was on the union side. The union side was against slavery.
My sideee :)
Because of the enormous new territories acquired from Mexico. These extended so far either side of the Missouri line that the Missouri Compromise was not workable. This intensified the debate over new territories joining the Union as slave-states.
the head is on the opposite side cause he was against slavery
Because of the enormous new territories acquired from Mexico. These extended so far either side of the Missouri line that the Missouri Compromise was not workable. This intensified the debate over new territories joining the Union as slave-states.
first you have to find the pros and cons of what you are debating. Then you try to support the ideas. After you search for details from the opposing side. There you got your structure of a debate!
Its according to which side of the highway your entering from...If entering from the left side of road then the left side is the inside lane.....if entering from right side then the right lane is the inside lane.....
Left side lane
He was against slavery, because he was on the union side. The union side was against slavery.
In most countries, the left side of the road is designated as the fast lane.
centre
William T. Sherman was against slavery because he was on the Union side. The Union side was against slavery. When the Confederate side was for slavery. So since Sherman's on the Union side, he was against it.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 primarily impacted the pro-slavery side, as it allowed for the possibility of slavery's expansion into territories that were previously designated as free under the Missouri Compromise. The act led to violent conflicts known as "Bleeding Kansas" as pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions clashed over the issue. Ultimately, the increased tension and violence shifted political power and public sentiment against the pro-slavery stance, contributing to its territorial losses in the long run.
This is a question that cannot be answered. It depends on your personal belief and the motion of the debate. It is only when there is an argument can there be a debate.
fskd;lfkd
When starting a debate on the opposing side, it's essential to acknowledge the validity of the opposing argument to establish common ground. Then, clearly state your position and outline your key points that will refute their claims. Use strong evidence and examples to support your stance, and engage the audience by highlighting the implications of your argument. This approach sets a respectful yet assertive tone for the debate.
Generally the lane closest to the center divider. Lanes are numbered from the left most lane on the side of the road you are on. Such as number one lane, the left most lane , is generally considered the fast lane.