It's a tricky question. The answer depends on who you ask and where their sympathies lay. Technically both sides supported the concept; but each side had different views on how it should work. Additionally, both sides argued against it in certain ways.
The South is generally considered, particularly by Southern sympathizers trying to rationalize the rebellion (that is, they don't want to admit that slavery was the actual cause of whole Civil War mess), to have strongly supported the concept. They argued that states had the right to leave the Union at any time for any reason. However, they also disliked Northern states passing laws against slavery within their own borders, or even that some Northern states were granting civil rights to black people. When they did secede and write their own constitution, they made a point of eliminating some states rights (mainly as pertained to slavery)- which is a little hypocritical.
However the North also argued in favor of the concept. They claimed that things like the Dred Scott decision and the Fugitive Slave Act were violations of the the rights of Free States. They also pointed out the South's inconsistency in applying states rights, as noted above. But the North disagreed with the South that states had the right to leave the Union- they believed the Union was meant to be "perpetual", as stated in the Articles of Confederation.
The truth of the matter is that both argued for states rights, but viewed them in different ways and applied their arguments inconsistently when it was convenient to them.
The South advocated Slavery and States Rights.
The orth
States' rights
He insisted that his only goal was to save the union, not end slavery
The South strongly supported states' rights, as this was a key component of their political ideology, especially in the context of slavery and resistance to federal authority. Southern states argued that they had the right to govern themselves and make their own laws, particularly regarding slavery and economic practices. In contrast, the North generally favored a stronger federal government that could impose laws and regulations uniformly across states, particularly to limit the expansion of slavery. This fundamental difference contributed to the tensions leading up to the Civil War.
The South advocated Slavery and States Rights.
The idea is called "states rights".
Daniel Webster
The orth
a bill of rights be added.
John C. Calhoun
It supported states' rights.
Andrew Jackson
It supported states' rights.
John C Calhoun supported right of states to veto federal law.
citizens of individual states were also citizens of the united states
He supported state's rights, at least thats all that I know at the moment.