Alaska
Integration was not the rule in the Northern states during the 19th and early 20th centuries, though it varied by region and community. While many Northern states abolished slavery and had more progressive attitudes compared to the South, racial segregation and discrimination still existed in various forms, including in schools, housing, and public accommodations. Efforts for integration and civil rights gained momentum in the mid-20th century, leading to significant changes, but challenges persisted. Overall, while there was a greater emphasis on integration in the North, it was not universally applied or accepted.
Oklahoma
After the ruling on the case Brown vs The Board of Education segregation in schools was illegal. Some states such as Virginia, Arkansas, Mississippi and Alabama tried many different tactics to keep integration from happening.
The United States "came to" the American Indian. The First Peoples were here thousands of years before the European invasions and the subsequent formation of the United States of America.
Masood Hyder has written: 'October Coup by Mohammed Hyder (ed. Masood Hyder)' -- subject(s): Indian independence, integration of the princely states 'The UN conference on the law of the sea' -- subject(s): Case studies, Negotiation, Diplomacy
The British Raj (Reign in Hindustani) was the British rule over the Indian sub continent from 1858 when it took control from the East India Company following the Mutiny 0f 1857. In addition there were Native or Princely states that came under the sovereignty of the British who were responsible for foreign and military affairs but were self governed.
A province is a territorial unit within a country or state that is governed by a centralized government, while a princely state refers to a region in India that was ruled by an Indian prince under the suzerainty of the British Crown during the colonial period. Princely states had varying degrees of autonomy and were eventually integrated into India after independence.
V. P. Menon has written: 'Integration of the Indian States'
A. U. Siddiqui has written: 'Indian freedom movement in princely states of Vindhya Pradesh' -- subject(s): Nationalism, Politics and government
Indians was emerging from the status of subjects to citizens.Independence of India was followed by partition over religious differences and large scale violence on both sides of the border.The British had left the decision of accession to either India or Pakistan or remain as independent entities to the princely states and their joining the country was a difficult task.India was a vast country with multiple regions, language, culture, customs and beliefs. This diversity was a hindrance in framing the constitution.
sind
Bahawalpur and Swat are two examples of 'Princely States' that joined Pakistan upon partition.
jaipur
At the time of Indian independence, India was divided into two sets of territories, the first being the territories of "British India", which were under the direct control of the India Office in London and the Governor-General of India, and the second being the "Princely states", the territories over which the Crown had suzerainty, but which were under the control of their hereditary rulers. In addition, there were several colonial enclaves controlled by France and Portugal. The political integration of these territories into India was a declared objective of the Indian National Congress, which the Government of India pursued over the next decade. Through a combination of factors, Vallabhbhai Patel and V. P. Menon convinced the rulers of almost all of the hundreds of princely states to accede to India. Having secured their accession, they then proceeded to, in a step-by-step process, secure and extend the central government's authority over these states and transform their administrations until, by 1956, there was little difference between the territories that had formerly been part of British India and those that had been part of princely states. Simultaneously, the Government of India, through a combination of diplomatic and military means, acquired de facto and de jure control over the remaining colonial enclaves, which too were integrated into India.Although this process successfully integrated the vast majority of princely states into India, it was not as successful in relation to a few states, notably the former princely state of Kashmir, the accession of which to India was disputed by Pakistan, the state of Hyderabad, whose ruler was determined to remain independent, and the states of Tripura and Manipur, where active secessionist movements existed.
there where e around 568 states in India before independence.....
Historically speaking, there have been several countries that have undergone partitioning. Since you do not specify which country you are interested in, it would be difficult to tell you how many princely states existed at the time it was partitioned.