I cant
Answer this question… D. He felt that the federal government should not be able to control business policies.
Colonists were a people separate from Britain. For Apex.
they spoke up for the colonists about the stamp act and the Townshend acts
Yes, Sojourner Truth did travel the country to speak against slavery. (I know because I need to know this for a History paper)
t
* It was Patrick Henry. I am absolutely sure.
Colonists had no one to speak for them in the British Parliament.
The First Amendment granted the colonists religion freedom. It also protected the colonials from British tyranny. This, of course, meant that they colonials could now speak up against the British in any manner deemed necessary.
No, because they could be punished really bad by the unlimited government.
Speak out against the government or the supreme leader.
You either get executed or send to a labor camp. no one is allowed to speak against the government.
Because they believed they should have a government speak for the colonists voice.
They needed money from the war. But more than that George 111 was a complete idiot and did not like the likes of colonists telling him what not to do and I speak as a UK resident. He was too arrogant to realise that the colonists could not afford what he was asking, not could his people at home
Nothing. Albania has freedom of speech.
No. People from Great Britain are British- most speak English. There is no language called British.
So far as I know it is permuted to speak out against the US government and most democratic western governments, However "sedition" is the word that comes to mind.
The Colonist's were being used as the bank for England. England was in terrible debt due to the wars in Europe and fighting Spain. The biggest issue was that the colonists had no right's to speak to what the British where doing to them. They were 'being taxed without representation' and had enough. If the British were to give the Colonies representation in Parliament they would kept the colonies under the crown.