There is no true answer except for the simple fact that the people in South were a lot less modernized compared to the North and liked to keep thing's 'old school'. They did not want to let go of the cultural education they had been fed on all their lives to never see black people as their equals. The KKK originated in Texas; the south. Much of the south was extremely racist and through the South was how many southern american immigrants came into the country. So they had a pure hatred for non european-americans because they were racists and that is the honest truth. People need to accept that they were racists to a degree of even following the footsteps of William Lynch ['lynching'] and that was the sole reason. They ignored that blacks were also people and felt that they are white and superior simply because they are white. And that black's have no right to be their equals and to live as free men. They were very sick people who had sick parents that brought them up in such a way.
Our) peculiar institution
The states south of Pennsylvania clung to the institution of slavery because it was the mainstay of the cotton industry - their only major export.
The "Peculiar Institution" was and remains a common euphemism for slavery in the U.S. southern slave states. People to this day will speak of "the South's Peculiar Institution" as a way of referring to slavery without actually using the word "slavery."
Short-Staple Cotton
The South's commitment to the institution of slavery made is a distinctive society in 1750. Britain thought of the South as the most valuable part of North America.
Our) peculiar institution
The states south of Pennsylvania clung to the institution of slavery because it was the mainstay of the cotton industry - their only major export.
The "Peculiar Institution" was and remains a common euphemism for slavery in the U.S. southern slave states. People to this day will speak of "the South's Peculiar Institution" as a way of referring to slavery without actually using the word "slavery."
The "Peculiar Institution" was and remains a common euphemism for slavery in the U.S. southern slave states. People to this day will speak of "the South's Peculiar Institution" as a way of referring to slavery without actually using the word "slavery."
James Henry Hammond was a staunch advocate for slavery and believed it was essential to the economic and social order of the South. He argued that slavery was a positive good, asserting that it benefited both enslaved people and Southern society as a whole. Hammond viewed the abolition of slavery as a threat to prosperity and stability, and he vehemently opposed any movements toward its end. His writings and speeches reflect a deep commitment to maintaining the institution of slavery.
it was critical for the south's agricultural economy.
John Calhoun defended the institution of slavery by refering to it as the South's "peculiar institution" in 1828 and it came into common usage in the 1830s as both abolitionists and defenders of slavery used the term to make their points.
To the contrary, Anti-Slavery advocates vehemently opposed the Fugitive Slave Act. It allowed slave hunters to take runaway slaves back to the South from anywhere in the country.
The institution of slavery became much stricter. The south demanded a federal slave code, the annexation of Cuba, and the reestablishment of the African Slave Trade.
Slavery was introduced to provide a cheap labor force.
The institution of slavery expanded and intensified in the South.
Short-Staple Cotton