Not really Math and physics are what make engineering
No, it is not true. It is false. In order to PASS physics, chemistry, and engineering, you must be pretty good at mathematics.
Not necessarily. You can still learn.
No. You can still excel or do well in physics even if you are not good at computer science and chemistry. For example, physics is one of my favorite subjects, and I am pretty good at it. I am also good in math, but have never done anything computer science-related. I dislike chemistry, but love physics. I do not know much about the engineering aspect though, sorry. I'm sure you'd be fine though.
It is, it will just be harder. So you might have to put extra work to achieve the same result as someone who has a stronger math/physics/chemistry background.The more you know about math, the more you can focus on the actual concept of engineering.
Chemistry, Physics and Engineering are not made up of just mathematics, there are a lot of understanding of the physics and chemistry concepts to do well in those courses too. Most people who are bad at math will have difficulty solving physics and chemistry problems (although they may understand the concepts). though they might be quite good at certain kinds of chemistry (synthetic organic chemistry, for example, which is more about memorization and less about mathematical skills). However, being good at math does not automatically mean you'll also be good at chemistry."Good at math" is also a somewhat vague term. You can be a whiz at simple arithmetic and still be horrible at analytical-type mathematics ("word problems") which are more similar to the kind of understanding of mathematics that's required in the physical sciences. So if someone doesn't have an understanding of the concepts, then they would have difficulty setting up the math equations (which will model the actual physics, chemistry etc.)
If you are close to a university library you could consult the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, if it's still available in printed form.
Physics (optics, electronics). Chemistry (composites from which the camera or camera parts are made, and film - in the camera that still uses it). Mechanical and industrial engineering (to design, fabricate and produce the camera).chemistry in the development of film and making prints.
Chemistry is applied to everything. It applies to physics, biology, etc. Honestly, I was taught that physics is the central science, and even though I am a chemistry major, I still think physics is the central science, but if somebody says they were taught or think it's chemistry I won't argue. I can see/understand both sides. Math is said to be the "language" of science, especially the two physical sciences physics and chemistry. It comes to the point that physics and chemistry are more-or-less two different sides of the same coin. You study very similar stuff, sometimes the same, but from difference perspectives. I think physics is a little more of the central science, but it's a bit hard to explain and understand (and it's a bit long to explain) if you haven't taken, or even talked, physical chemistry. The main reason many people think chemistry is the central science is because chemistry is applied to everything. No matter where you are, you, and everything around you is made up of atoms and molecules. That is why chemistry is the central science.
8 years worth (alternate answer) Doctors need to know a lot about chemistry, but not so much about physics. Still, there are aspects of medicine that involve physics, such as an MRI machine, a PET scanner, a CAT scanner, even an ordinary X ray machine. All of this involves nuclear physics. A radiologist would have to know a fair amount of physics. But not all specialties are involved with physics.
probably arent trained. or you arent letting them out enough.
no they arent
they do but some arent still into it.