they are kinda the same. two handed has more power, but long sword allows you to use a sheild. Rayquaza949 Rules lol.
The 2 handed sword is a lot better.
Longsword.
a large 2 handed sword, probably like a long sword or claymore
It depends entirely on the style of sword and combat. If you are using a two-handed sword you'll want it to be longer than a single-handed sword. The only rule I have ever heard in regards to the length of a sword is one for katanas, specifically that when holding the sword in your dominant hand pointing downwards with your arm down at your side, the tip of the blade should reach your ankle.
Yes, it is in the terms of strength and accuracy but the normal sword is faster than the long sword. But you would be better off with a scimitar because it more accurate (in slash) and has a better strength bonus than a short sword and just as fast as one. Use a long sword for stronger, more accurate, but slower stap and slash attacks. Use the scimitar for faster slash attacks And never use the normal sword because it is not as strong, accurate, or fast as the other types of swords.
it's a sword that was used during renaissance europe, it was mostly carried by gentlemen. The musketeer rapier sword is a a long, straight-bladed cut-and-thrust single-handed sword optimized for the thrust and featuring a guard that affords good protection to the hand.
You cannot upgrade your sword, but you can do a long mini-quest to get the big goron sword. That should not be confused with the goron knife which costs money, but a better not brake-able sword that is better then the master sword, but it makes you use your shield as if you were young link.
That depends on the sword model. The bastard sword (long sword, one and a half sword) is classical sword from medieval times. Medeival warriors used one handed sword usually with shield or more effective bastard sword. Bastard swords offered higher penetration and it was also more effective against mounted knights. ............................................................. The longsword which is also known as a bastard sword (further modified into a claymore sword) was a medieval weapon. They were a real sword used by warriors on the battlefield but in modern times due to increase in development, replica swords are also being made.
A long sword is a sword that was primary used in western Europe it was used for sword and board type if item
As long as Arthur has the scabbard he can't be killed.
WHEN U R READING THIS DONT STOP OR SOMETHING BAD WILL HAPPEN! {SORRYABOUT THIS} THIS GIRL'S NAME IS SUMMER SHE'S 15 YEARS OLD & hasBLONDE HAIR ,MANY SCARS no NOSE OR EARS.. SHE IS DEAD. IF U DONT COPYTHIS JUST LIKE FROM THE RING, COPY N POST THIS ON 5 MORE SITES.. OR..SUMMER WILL APPEAR ONE DARK QUIET NIGHT WHEN UR NOT……………………… ……… ExPECTING IT BYYOUR BED WITH A KNIFE AND KILL U. THIS IS NO JOKE SOMETHING GOOD WILLHAPPEN TO U IF YOU POST THIS ON 5 MORE PAG
One obvious way to kill a knight was with another better trained knight. Bows, crossbows, javelins and other projectile weapons were a severe weakness of any close combatant, one key reason why they adopted the use of expensive heavy armour. One way to kill a knight in close combat is to use weapons not in his range, for example a knight using a longsword (a two-handed blade) is less effective in tight areas than a knight with an arming sword (single-handed sword) or better still one using a dagger. If the opponent was using a sword, then a polearm would outrange that and keeping distance would ensure victory, whilst an opponent with a polearm would struggle in the range that an arming sword uses. Siege weapons such as trebuchets, ballistae and cannon were also effective long term against defending knights.
Either can be "better" than the other, depending on what it is used for. If you are harvesting the agave cactus to make mescal or cutting your way through a jungle, the machete is better. If you are in hand-to-hand combat, a Japanese sword (katana) is probably better, as long as you are trained to use it correctly and effectively.