They are both fun games, but they are different. Call of Duty 3 still has us in WW2 whereas Modern Warfare takes us into Russia and parts of Africa in a counter-terrorism campaign. Both are excellent games, with pros and cons to each. It all depends on what type of game you want.
yea call of duty 3 is a game in WWII with allot of old guns but in modern warfare (call of duty 4) you are taken into a war in the future its kinda like being in the war that's going on now in real life
Personaly i like call of duty modern warfare 2 because of all the different gun variety
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare: Reflex
CoD 4 MW
In Xbox Live i say no but the campaign is cool
Modern Warfare 2 all the way dude. But just wait for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 coming November 2011
Modern Warfare 2
well call of duty and modern warfare are the same it is called Call of Duty: Modern warfare and then came call of duty: modern warfare 2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare Reflex Edition is only made for the Nintendo Wii and the better pair of games Call of Duty Modern Warfare and Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 are not made for the Nintendo Wii.
Call of duty modern warfare 2 is better than socom because with modern warfare 2 you have better weapons and you run faster on the game. I agree it is way better!
Modern Warfare 2.
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2
Call of Duty classic Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare Call of Duty World at War Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 call of duty black ops call of duty modern warfare 3
Call of Duty Modern Warfare came before Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2