cod 5
No the Graphics on Call of Duty World at War are supposed to be better with increased audio and video effects. see related links
AnswerCall of Duty does have better graphics but only the newest ones. Halo's graphics beats World at War, Call of Duty 1-3, and the handheld versions for sure. Halo shouldn't be compared to Call of Duty. Should be compared to like Gears of War.
Call of Duty includes much better graphics and a bloodwarming Zombie gamemode. Battlefield has ok graphics and doesn't include a zombie gamemode. Call of Duty is better.
No there really awsome espesialy zobies are alot better
i prefer call of duty but medal of honor has better graphics
well 4 has better graphics and you should buy that
well call of duty is one of the best gaming series and its first person while world of warcraft is this crappy game that only f*gs play with sh*t graphics compared to call of duty
call of duty is a better game for online multyplayer, but if you like a good campain with good graphics go with MOH
i say halo 3
call of duty 2 pones metal gear solid by way theres online on call of duty its more realistic and better graphics and serriouslly nuclear bombs can kill a person in a snap so no graphics at all this why call of duty pones metal gear solid
Call of duty, definitely. Because it is more educational and it gives you a wide, WIDE, range of weapons. And the graphics are better overall.
call of duty is better