answersLogoWhite

0

Well, if art didn't exist, there wouldn't be much to learn about. Architecture wouldn't exist! All those famous artists and Architects would be nothing! Mattise, Da Vinci, Gustavino... they would probably live their lives out as peasants. The world would be dull... a plain landscape with no one to paint it. Schools wouldn't have art classes, no more Mona Lisa, NOTHING! Let's just be thankful that the world does have art.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Visual Arts

How would you identify pop art?

how would you identify pop art


What is the influence of folk art in art?

I would look at: Quilting and Abstract art African Art and Cubism (picasso) Patterning and Feminist Art


When did contemporary art start?

Sorry, but the term "contemporary" art isn't a movement in art. That means contemporary art of the 1920s is art that was in the process of being created during the 1920s, and contemporary art of today is art that is being created today. To answer your question literally, contemporary art starts now. But I think you may mean when did the idea of modern art come into play. I would say the 1950s are the start of what we call modern art and that it turned into modern art in roughly the 1970s.


Does pop art still exist?

Yes, pop art still exists and continues to evolve, influencing contemporary art, fashion, and design. While the classic movement is often associated with artists like Andy Warhol and Roy Lichtenstein, its themes of consumerism and popular culture are still relevant today. Modern artists often incorporate pop art aesthetics and concepts into their work, reflecting current societal trends and technology. Thus, pop art remains a vital part of the artistic landscape.


Must art communicate something or be about something?

Art does not necessarily have to communicate a specific message or be about something concrete; it can exist for aesthetic enjoyment or personal expression. Many artists create works that evoke emotions or provoke thought without a defined subject matter. Ultimately, the interpretation of art is subjective, and its value can lie in the experience it provides to the viewer, rather than in a particular narrative or meaning.