The thing people need to realise about so-called gun control is that it does not equate to crime control. If it's being imposed for the sake of a political agenda, it can certainly work to a political aim. If it's being imposed as a feel good measure - a substitute for actual crime deterrence and control - it cannot.
Depends on WHICH gun control legislation you mean. In the US, there are already several thousand "gun control" laws on the books. However, they do not work. They DO keep honest people from being able to defend themselves from criminals.
If you are "pro" in the gun control debate, you are for less gun control. In other words, you are "pro-gun".
There is no "gun control" amendment.
opposing.Versus, contra, counter"I am against gun control" could also be phrased "I'm opposed to gun control", "I'm anti-gun control", "I'm an opponent of gun control", "I disagree with the idea of gun control"
Gun Control
They have gun laws. Whether they actually have the words "gun control" within any of their firearms legislature, I don't know, but they do have gun control.
Yes, Ross Perot is for gun control. He was not a typical Conservative and was pro gun control and pro choice.
It is extremely anti-gun control.
Your question is asking for an opinion. My opinion: There are more than 20,000 gun laws already on the books- and they do not work. They do not work because people that commit crimes do not obey laws.
A person against gun control. A pro-gun advocate. A pro-2A advocate (in the US).
type into google gun control usa.
Obama is a Democrat. Democrats are liberal. Liberals support heavy gun control.