How might Stevens have responded to a statement like that made by kaiulani?

Answer 1

Stevens might have responded to Kaiulani's statement with a mix of political pragmatism and cultural dismissal, emphasizing the necessity of American expansionism while downplaying the importance of native sovereignty. He could have argued that the annexation of Hawaii was in the best interest of both the U.S. and the islands, framing it as a means to modernize and bring stability. This response would likely reflect his belief in American exceptionalism and manifest destiny, contrasting sharply with Kaiulani's perspective on the loss of her nation's independence. Ultimately, Stevens might have shown a lack of empathy towards the native Hawaiian plight, prioritizing political and economic interests over cultural considerations.