Somewhat. The .25 cal is just bigger and hits harder. Other than shape and air pressure behind the pellet, the size and weight of the pellet has a effect on the accuracy.
OKAY look at it this way. (Pellets come in different weights.) a lightweight pellet will fly faster and farther than a heavy pellet. BUT it is more effected by crosswind than a heavy weight pellet. The Heavy pellet will fly straighter, slower and have more knockdown power than a lighter pellet.
So a .25 cal pellet is heaver and slower than a .22 cal pellet but it has more impact and a little more accurate than a .22 cal pellet.
PCP rifles come in different sizes. like .177, .20, .22, .25, 9mm, .357 cal 45 cal and 50 cal. Hitting a target with a .177 cal is like hitting it with a BB, but hit it with a 50 cal and you rip a huge hole in the target. The .177 will fly a lot farther but the 50 cal is a destroyer.
I own both a .22 cal and a .25 cal Marauder. along with several others.
Metric units have many advantages over Imperial units but precision and accuracy are not amongst them. Precision and accuracy depends on the individual units in use. For example, A kilometre is more accurate than a mile, A furlong is more accurate than a kilometre, A metre is more accurate than a kilometre, A yard is more accurate than a metre, A foot is more accurate than a metre, An inch is more accurate than a foot, A centimetre is more accurate than an inch, A thou is more accurate than a centimetre, and so on, and on.
Agreed, stock for stock the marauder would win. However, the caprice does have the LT1 motor with a lot of potential to be unlocked, the marauder too, but it would be a lil more costly. For the Caprice, if u get a programmer, intake, exhaust, re-do the gears and a couple other inexpensive mods, the Caprice would kill that Mustang GT motor easily and you'd be pushing close to or a lil more than 400hp. You get A LOT of power with that power especially! The Marauder is also a sleeper as well, because you can get a used M112 supercharger for dirt cheap and then that 320hp marauder is now 400hp+ and packin more in torque.
Benjamin Franklin believed a "Turkey" would make a more suitable symbol of the United States than the eagle.
Neither is more inherently accurate than the other.
Yes, for they are simply more accurate and on point.
It is more accurate, a 4 wire is more accurate than 3 wire and 3 wire is more accurate than 2 wire.
everybody has this question when it comes to comparing the 2004 marauder with the 96 impala ss. both cars are full size sedans with big v8s. most would agree that they are evenly match in the performance department. so what exactly set them apart? well in this case the marauder seem to have the upper edge over the aging SS. the marauder is more modern and tune better than the SS. the SS is a sloppy driving machine. it doesn't corner like the marauder does, the weight is not distributed evenly throughout the car which makes a big difference in driving. basically the marauder would beat the SS but not leave it in the dust, because the SS is not slow, but it just drive differently, plus its much more heavier. the marauder is superior to the impala SS. the marauder would beat the SS in a race but it would not blow it away because both cars almost identical in engine packages and everything. finally it all depends who driving the cars, and how they drive it.
The more accurate number - is 1.005 - as it is accurate to more decimal places than the other examples.
Usually more accurate than the shooter
There is no more accurate descriptions of matter than measurements. To get the description right make your measurements precise.
Aggregated forecasts are more accurate than individual product forecasts.
The pycnometer method is more accurate than the hydrometer method because it uses an analytical balance.