That depends on whose wrong hands.
I don't believe anyone is supposed to have any kind of nuclear weapons due to the arms limitations treaties of the Cold War. I could be wrong, I'm not a big military official.
.... Could you clarify as to what "knowlogy" is? If you mean knowledge, you could say that medecine can help to cure people but in the wrong hands - the poorly trained, those with bad motives - it can damage or even kill. Similarly, physics can help to build nuclear reactors for peace or war , for electricity or nuclear weapons.
Yes, it not only damages the environment but it also kills wildlife and can affect human life and can destroy it.
Probably making nuclear weapons and threatening people(this is what I think). Oh and you spelled peace wrong. :)
They can destroy from a big city to half the world, depending how powerful it is.
Nothing is wrong with his hands
Nuclear bombs have devastating effects, causing widespread destruction and loss of life. They also have long-lasting environmental consequences, such as radiation contamination that can persist for decades and impact ecosystems and human health. Additionally, the potential for nuclear weapons to fall into the wrong hands or be used unintentionally poses a significant global security risk.
Plutonium is highly toxic and radioactive, posing significant health and environmental risks if mishandled or released into the environment. Additionally, its production and handling raise proliferation concerns, as plutonium can also be used in nuclear weapons.
Some cons of nuclear power include the risks of accidents and meltdowns, the challenges of long-term radioactive waste disposal, and the potential for nuclear proliferation if the technology falls into the wrong hands. Additionally, the high upfront costs of building and maintaining nuclear power plants can be a deterrent for some countries.
The main dangers associated with nuclear energy include the potential for accidents, such as meltdowns or radioactive leaks, which can release harmful radiation into the environment. There are also concerns about the long-term storage of radioactive waste and the risk of nuclear proliferation if the technology falls into the wrong hands.
Negative aspects of nuclear fission include the generation of radioactive waste that requires long-term storage, the risk of accidents leading to releases of radioactive materials, and the potential for nuclear proliferation if the technology falls into the wrong hands. Additionally, the cost of building and maintaining nuclear power plants can be prohibitive.
The cold war has come and gone, but the weapons that caused the cold war still remain. In the 1960s , every person of age living in the world was aware of the threat that Nuclear Weapons posed. The world was in such a tense state that Nuclear drills were as common as Tornado drills. This was with only the United States and Russia having Nukes. Today, there are quite a few countries with nuclear weapons. It might surprise some people that India and Pakistan both have Nukes. Of course North Korea has nuclear weapons now as well as Isreal. It looks like the world has to prepare for Nuclear Iran in the future as well. Most people don't know the stakes anymore. For instance, 1000 Nuclear weapons can end life on earth. Both the US and Russia have enough weapons to do this. 1000 Nukes can create a global Nuclear Winter and life would wither away and the earth's atmosphere would change. To keep it short.... We created a weapon that can end our time on the greatest planet on earth. Its not really about war. Its about the wrong people getting their hands on Nuclear arsenals.... Mistakes, computer errors.. etc. We've come closer to Nuclear war than many people know. Watch the video above and see how close we've come to all out destruction.