Appeasement, particularly by Britain and France towards Nazi Germany in the 1930s, allowed Hitler to expand German territory and military power unchecked. The Munich Agreement of 1938, which permitted the annexation of the Sudetenland, exemplified this policy, as Western powers believed it would prevent a larger conflict. However, this strategy emboldened Hitler, leading to further aggression, including the invasion of Poland in 1939, which ultimately triggered World War II. The failure to confront fascist expansionism highlighted the inadequacies of appeasement and its catastrophic consequences.
It made chaus
Appeasement did not really lead to the outbreak of World War 2 in the European Theater. The Nazis had already planned on invading nations so the appeasement and the non-aggression pacts were all merely a joke to the Nazis.
Appeasement is a diplomatic strategy aimed at avoiding conflict by making concessions to an aggressive power. It often involves yielding to the demands of a hostile nation in hopes of maintaining peace and stability. However, this approach can embolden the aggressor, leading to further demands and potential escalation of tensions. Historically, appeasement has been criticized for failing to prevent wars, as seen in the lead-up to World War II.
appeasement encouraged aggression
it did not lead to ww2. Don't be a bad boy and do your homework! Plagiarize and be a risk taker. SHALALALAALALALALA goja
It made chaus
To let Churchill lead the nation in WW2. Also, he had: 1) Not prepared the UK sufficiently (through re-armament) for war with Germany and 2) supported Chamberlain's policy of appeasement with Nazi Germany.
To let Churchill lead the nation in WW2. Also, he had: 1) Not prepared the UK sufficiently (through re-armament) for war with Germany and 2) supported Chamberlain's policy of appeasement with Nazi Germany.
yes in WW2 But before that ? There is much criticism of Appeasement which denegrates Chamberlain, the UK PM at the outset of WW2, but did anyone else do anything different to deter Hitlers rise to power ? No is the answer.
The result of the Munich Conference on the brink of WW2 was that British and French leaders chose appeasement and allowed Hitler to annex territory.
No, WW2.
Appeasement did not really lead to the outbreak of World War 2 in the European Theater. The Nazis had already planned on invading nations so the appeasement and the non-aggression pacts were all merely a joke to the Nazis.
The instalation of Hitler and WW2
WW2
Appeasement.
It really was not appeasement that lead to war it was the deception by Hitler that angered the nations who signed non-aggression pacts with Hitler. They declared war on him when he attacked Poland (who had not signed a non-aggression pact with Hitler). In truth it was not the violation of appeasement non-aggression pacts that started the war it was the violation of the Treaty of Versailles that incensed the French and Brits. They declared war after Hitler went after Poland with a military force he was not supposed to have and for an aggression he was not supposed to carry out.
no. ww2 did