it caused the crops and stuff to go bad
The French Revolution of 1789 (and the following decade) made quite a number of short-term and long-term impacts upon Europe and upon the world. One short-term effect was the toppling of the French ruling dynasty, soon to be followed by the installment of the military dictatorship (and then imperial governance) of Napoleon. Longer-term effects followed through the rising power of France: revolutionary ideas spread throughout Europe, planting seeds that would later sprout into a harvest of nationalist and vaguely democratic movements that brought about the end of the monarchic age and the maturing of European Modernity.
Well, the Bolsheviks revolution was when marxists (communists) tried to take over Russia. This was bad because this meant all their powers will basically be taken away, and the Russians tried to fight them off with the Allies (Bristish (includes Canadians) and French). Hope this helps ^.^
Middle class people wanted a greater political role and peasants also wanted more freedom. The french government and upper classes proved incapable of reform. That resulted the Economic slump. which set the seal on revolution.
France had a National debt crisis, heavy taxation and a grain shortage because of two years of bad weather. Bread was difficult to obtain and the prices had increased. The Monarchy was not responding to the possibility of starvation. The peasants wanted change.
no
The French had an enormous National debt, prices of bread rose because of a bad harvest. France was in the midst of an economic crisis and had an unfair tax code. The french helped fund the American revolution and thus had no money themselves. With no money in the French government the country revolted. The French economy was in shambles and it was on the verge of bankruptcy. Change in the old tax code was essential.
BOTH
Very bad you don't know this answer
After the bad harvest in 1788 caused many problems in the Third estate. They could not get their hands on bread and all the women led a mob to the Versailles to protest against Mary Antoinette.
The agricultural revolution has nothing to do with the french revolution . the agricultural revolution is about the problems in the countryside with food to grow thing and all the rich people had no need to grow food and the french revolution is the economic revolution
Because the French felt that anything that was bad for the United Kingdom was good for France.
A bad harvest in France often leads to food shortages, which can trigger social unrest and protests among the populace. This discontent may escalate into larger movements, such as the French Revolution, where widespread hunger and economic hardship fueled demands for political change and social equality. Additionally, poor harvests can result in increased prices for food, further exacerbating the struggles of the lower classes.
The French had an enormous National debt, prices of bread rose because of a bad harvest. France was in the midst of an economic crisis and had an unfair tax code. The french helped fund the American revolution and thus had no money themselves. With no money in the French government the country revolted. The French economy was in shambles and it was on the verge of bankruptcy. Change in the old tax code was essential.
the french care so much about the revolution because it made a massive impact on, not just France, but Europe! if the revolution had not happened, France and possibly even the rest of Europe would not be what it is today. France might still have estates, kings and bad execution habits but because of this revolution, people all around Europe started to realise what France had become. i hope this answer is helpful :)
1787 was not a bad harvest, in fact; but the autumn was very wet, which delayed sowing; the Spring of 1788 was hot, which dried the young shoots, and in July there was a horrific hailstorm over a large area of the country, which completely destroyed cereals and grapes. After that the winter of 1788-9 was exceptionally hard.
I'm a Napoleon supporter so I have more good to say about him than bad ha. However, Napoleon in many ways went against the ideals of the Revolution. Firstly, the French Revolution fought for democracy but Napoleon was a dictator. Secondly, one other ideal of the French Revolution is to have checks and balances within the government but Napoleon made almost all the political decisions on his own. Overall, Napoleon's style of government was closer to absolutism which was a big no-no of the French Revolution.