It is known that the Russian side lost 60,000 troops in the Kerensky (or July) Offensive of World War I. The total number of casualties for the Austro-Hungarian and German side is unknown.
During the first day of the 1st battle of the Somme, the British suffered 20,000 casualties
During World War 2 the total casualty lost by the British were about 455,000.
Compared to what? Total American casualties in WW1 were significantly lower than either WW2 or the US Civil War, and the casualty rate (number of casualties suffered per 100,000 deployed) was lower than most wars Americans fought in during the 1800s. American casualty rates were comparable to (though slightly higher than) British or French rates during the same time period.
France suffered more casualties during World War I primarily due to its geographic location and military strategy, which involved heavy fighting on the Western Front. The French army faced intense and prolonged battles, such as the Battle of Verdun and the Somme, often fighting on their own soil against well-entrenched German forces. Additionally, France mobilized a larger proportion of its population for military service compared to the English Empire, leading to higher casualties relative to its population size. The scale and intensity of the conflict in France, combined with the tactics employed, contributed significantly to its higher death toll.
Oh, dude, Alexander Kerensky lost support because he couldn't quite juggle all the different factions in the Russian Revolution. Like, he was trying to keep everyone happy, but it's kinda hard when you've got Bolsheviks, Mensheviks, and all those other -eviks running around causing chaos. In the end, he just couldn't hold it together, and poof, there goes his support.
the number of casualties in the battle of Berlin was..
In the Monitor vs. Merrimack battle during the Civil War, there were no casualties.
23000 casualties
42879 casualties were found after the battle
Antietam
The largest American action to take place during WW1 was also one of the bloodiest to be seen during the war. The Hundred Day Offensive ended with over one million casualties on both sides.
who had th most battle casualties during the second world war, us.infantry
The Second Battle of the Somme, fought in March and April 1918, was part of Germany's Spring Offensive during World War I. The battle resulted in a tactical victory for the German forces, who aimed to break through Allied lines. However, the offensive ultimately failed to achieve its strategic objectives, leading to a prolonged stalemate. The battle showcased the intense fighting and high casualties that characterized the war during this period.
2,000 on the United State's Side
Around 375,000 Soviets were to be killed during the Battle of Stalingrad. In total, the soviets had 1.12 million casualties and most of these were wounded or sick casualties.
There are two. The first is:Revolutionary War: Battle of OriskanyCivil War: Battle of AntietamThere are several ways to answer this question:If the question is "largest single-day casualties", then the answer is the Battle of Antietam in 1862 during Civil War, with 22,000 casualties (total of both sides).If the question is "largest individual battle casualties", that would most likely be the Battle of Gettysburg in 1863 during the Civil War, with total casualties of 47,000+.If the question is "largest campaign casualties", then the Battle of the Bulge in 1944 during WW2 would qualify, at about 90,000 total.Finally, if the question is "highest rate of casualties in a battle", that would be the Battle of Peleliu in 1944, during WW2. It had a rate of about 30%, with just under 10,000 casualties for 28,000 men engaged.
Highest casualties - Gettysburg (3-day battle) Highest casualties in one day - Antietam/Sharpsburg