No. They had no Italian mercenaries, but did have Germans. The king asked Catherine the Great to send Russian troops, but she refused.
The British government was several thousand miles away and a good 3 months sail away. Any government who is that far from a colony needs to use local government.
the purpose was so that they could rule the other countries and use them to make their profit.
"Scorched earth" policies (burning homes and farms so that they had no food) and concentration camps.
Pizarro was determind to reach trips. Supplies Pizarro brought on his trip were any thing that would be able to fight with.
British soldiers were nicknamed "Tommies"- see the poem by Rudyard Kipling. For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Chuck him out, the brute!" But it's "Saviour of 'is country," when the guns begin to shoot;
lol s.s HW
lol s.s HW
lol s.s HW
lol s.s HW
NO!!! The British still employ/use mercenaries today. They are the Ghurka Regiment of the British Army. In formal legalistic terms they are mercenaries.
yes because they didnt know how to fight in the war
yes because they didnt know how to fight in the war
yes because they didnt know how to fight in the war
no because, the mercenaries were highly trained and were skilled. hope you like it. :D :)
no because, the mercenaries were highly trained and were skilled. hope you like it. :D :)
no because, the mercenaries were highly trained and were skilled. hope you like it. :D :)
no because, the mercenaries were highly trained and were skilled. hope you like it. :D :)