Louis XIV was the king of France and Navarre. His social class and that of his family was Royalty, of course. He was descended from the Bourbon kings of France on his father's side and from the Habsburg Spanish/Austrian kings/emperors on his mother's side. He had nothing but royal ancestors dating back hundreds of years from the the Habsburg line and the Bourbon line was also of ancient royalty and nobility.
had taken away the right to vote from the middle class Louis xvII
The middle class people of France were known as the bourgeoisie. They represent the wealthiest social class, and are identifiable by their ownership of capital. In France, they represented the Third Estate, and were forced to shoulder the expenses of the first two estates prior to the French Revolution.
The actions of Louis XIV effected the economy of France in a multitude of ways. The most clear way was by his policy of war. He was involved in numerous wars throughout his reign. These were very expensive. He greatly taxed the peasants and farmers instead of the noble class which was tax-exempt. These heavy taxes lead to economic problems and poverty of France.
They were in the same social class, but were not accorded any social status.
The top social class in ancient Chinese societies was typically occupied by nobles and priests. They were the only ones allowed to join this class of people.
Denis Diderot was born into a middle-class family and worked as a writer and philosopher during the Enlightenment era in France.
Willy Russell's family belonged to the working class. His upbringing has greatly influenced his plays and writing, which often explore themes of class and social issues.
The July Revolution in 1830 brought Louis-Phillippe to the throne of France. The upper middle class secured a political and social ascendancy that characterized the period known as the July Monarchy.
middle class
ashu jiwarajka is a great guy
The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.
i think from my social studies class that its Spain
Birth: the family you were born in. Later in life, a good education and a succesful career can take you up into a higher social class. But someone born into a socially high-end family will usually still be considered a member of his family's social class even if he or she is not much of an achiever.
Global Studies Honors HSES ~Honors Class Mrs. Chan
had taken away the right to vote from the middle class Louis xvII
There were always social classes. A lot of it depended on which family you were born in. For example, if you were born into a lower class family then it was more than likely you were going to be low class to, and vice versa.
Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.