"Sources vary on the source of the fire but agree it was caused by human activity; one version faults an imperial oil surveying crew with starting a small blaze to protect their horses from biting insects." -- Wikipedia
your mother started it AH BURN! Yeeah.. Right!! The miramichi fire started because of lightening!! GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT Actually the great Miramichi fire started because there was a drout that summer and everything got so dry a forest fire started.Then it just kept on speading
mr. rochesters candle
Blame for the Great Fire of Rome has been attached to two sides. The Emperor Nero was blamed for his lack of action, and there were even suggestions that he may have started it himself in order to bypass the senate and rebuild Rome to his liking. Evidence to support this theory includes the fact that the Domus Aurea, Nero's majestic series of villas and pavilions set upon a landscaped park and a man-made lake, was built in the wake of the fire. To direct attention away from himself, Nero used the Christians as scapegoats. Thus began the earliest persecutions of Christians in Rome, action which included feeding them to the lions.
Who started the fire is not entirely certain. The blame was placed on a Marinus van der Lubbe (although it is likely taht he was either forced to by the Nazi Party or was framed by them).
Gyfolks was a loyal and wise man who had started the great fire of London. However people where trying to frame him to get him locked up for this.
Chinchaga Wildland Park was created in 2000.
The fire at Mrs. Blake's house was started by an electrical malfunction in the wiring. It was determined to be an accidental fire with no signs of foul play.
Started a Fire was created on 2008-02-04.
At a fire investigation there will be tried to find out where the fire has started and there will be investigated what caused the fire. Experts can tell by the traces how the fire spread and how it started.
There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.
The fire started in a baker's shop in Pudding Lane.
when a fire started
Mrs. O'Leary owned the cow near where the fire started. There was no proof that the cow started the fire.
-10 digrees just before the fire started and when the fire started it got really,really hot it was 25d digreeds celicious
No one really knows who started the fire,but i heard that mrs.ol'eary started it by lighting a lantern & a cow knocked it over.
it started in pudding lane it was a baker
The book The Outsiders never says how the fire definitely started but Johnny does state that one of their cigarettes must have started it. As for where it happened, the fire started in an abandoned church on a hill in Windrixville.