The society was separated into Church and secular, each with its own hierarchies.
In the beginning of medieval times, the Church was mostly, but not all, based in Rome. In later times, after 1054, the Roman Church had divided into Roman Catholic, based in Rome and headed by a Pope, and the Eastern Orthodox, headed by the Patriarch of Constantinople.
The Church was divided functionally into the ordinary clergy, who are referred to as secular because they minister to the needs of secular people, and the monastics, who are referred to as regular because they are regulated by monastic rules.
The secular clergy are ordered as follows, from the highest rank down:
Pope in Rome or Patriarch of Constantinople
Cardinals (Roman Church), archbishops who could elect a new pope
Archbishops (Roman Church), senior bishops
Bishops, heads of dioceses, which consisted of geographical groups of churches
Priests of local churches
Deacons, lower order in local churches
The regular clergy are ordered as follows, again top down:
Pope or Patriarch
Grand Master, heads of monastic order, which could be worldwide in scope
Abbots, heads of local monasteries
Monks, who were the members of monasteries
Novices, training to become monks
The secular people also each had a place in a social hierarchy. The social hierarchy, from the top down, was as follows:
Monarch, who could be emperor, king, prince, or duke, but was independent
Nobility
Freemen
Serfs
Slaves
A king could be a vassal of an emperor, and so was not always an independent monarch. Similarly, princes and dukes were usually vassals to kings or emperors. The English nobility consisted of the following, from the top down:
King or Queen
Prince or Princess
Archduke or Archduchess
Duke or Duchess
Marquess or Marchioness
Earl or Countess
Viscount or Viscountess
Baron or Baroness
Baronet or Baronetess (not in medieval times)
Knight or Dame (not hereditary in England)
Esquire (not always nobility)
Continental nobility was the same but with different spellings, except that the continental equivalent of an earl is a count.
Freemen were not all middle class. The highest levels of the free were such people as prosperous businessmen. These people were not of inconsiderable stature. One family that is very well known even today, for example, was the Medici banking family, which later became nobility. The Hanseatic League rivalled nations in importance, and its merchants, who were not nobility, rivalled the nobility in their areas in importance.
The lowest levels of freemen were hardly above the serfs. They included small craftsmen, such as bakers, potters, or smiths. Indeed, at the lowest level of the free were Travellers, who are sometimes now rather inaccurately referred to as Gypsies, and included the least of the itinerant musicians, jugglers, and tinkers.
Serfs were not slaves, but were not free to leave the land they worked on. They had a set of fixed mutual obligations with their lords. They provided the lords with parts of the fruits of their labor, and the lords protected them and provided them with a place to live and work. The serfs had rights, and one of these rights was a right to live on the land they occupied; if the land was sold, the new owner was not allowed to evict them and replace them with someone else.
Slaves existed or not, depending on the country. The tendency during the middle ages was to free slaves. The reasons for this are not entirely clear, but could have been based on the acceptance of Christianity, because the Old Testament laws do not permit keeping believers in bondage for longer than seven years.
No it was not. It was a name for the rich in medieval times and the majority of the population were certainly not wealthy!
Churches are illustrative of the innovative architecture of medieval Europe.
Treason!!
in my dick
In Medieval times the wells were sometimes polluted because the ground was full of dirt and some people or babies spit in it and think it was a garbage can
They though of it as what depended on the social structure and the religion
Like the Medieval social structure, there were very stark contrasts between the rich and poor in the Songhai Empire. Monarchs were at the top while landless slaves formed the base of the social hierarchy. However, there is one distinct way Songhai differed from Medieval social structure, Songhai religious officials were not considered a separate social class.
With the pope but some power went to the counts as well.
The church, the nobility, and then the peasant. On the bottom was the serf/slave.
The likely word is castle, a large fortified structure dating from medieval times.
Medieval Africa had diverse social structures depending on the region and cultural group. Some societies had centralized kingdoms with a hierarchical structure, while others were organized into smaller chiefdoms or clans. Social status was often determined by factors such as birth, wealth, and occupation, and there were distinctions between rulers, nobles, commoners, and slaves.
During the Middle Ages, artists were mostly independent craftsmen. This put them outside the much talked about structure of medieval social classes, which consisted of peasants, nobles, and clergy. Along with merchants, craftsmen were what we would call middle class, a group most medieval social theorists chose to ignore when they wrote about the structure of feudalism.
it was based on feudalism... there is a feudalism pyramid if you go on google images and type in feudalism pyramid
Yes. It went Emperor, Shogun, Daimyo, Farmers, Artisans, Merchants.
the Pardoner was a commissioner who was sent to collect alms and provide indulgence as a reward
it is a complex system of rights with king on top then nobles next lords then knights and finally peasants
There were no dinosaurs in medieval times.