WWII had armored tanks and civilian casualties were higher than in WWI.
world war 1
NO! The Civil War was between secessionist Confederate states and the US government. WW1 was between two allied groups of feuding European nations.
No
who were the leaders involved in WW1 who were the leaders involved in WW1
ww1 was about 11,016,000. ww2 was about 59,028,000
THE ATOMIC BOMB WAS USED IN WW2
they use the uranium 206 for the purpose of bom
DIfferences in WW1 and WW2 are the number of deaths.There were almost 11,016,000 deaths in WWIThere were almost 59,028,000 deaths in WWII.How_many_died_in_ww1_and_ww2
Speaking on a general level: WWI was the war of the 'big guns' and the machine guns, WW II of the tanks and air power.
Neither. It was between WW1 and WW2.
There wasn't enough time for the anti-war movement to take hold during WW1, it only lasted a year for the US.
World War I (WW1) resulted in approximately 20 million deaths, while World War II (WW2) caused around 70-85 million deaths, making WW2 significantly more deadly than WW1.
WW2 primarily consisted of ADVANCED models of the same war-functioning Airplanes, Submarines, Battleships, Tanks, Rifles, etc. of WW1. The only TWO real technology differences between WW1 & WW2 was the "Aircraft Carrier", and "Atomic Weapons" which were detonated in 1945.
world war 1
there were many changes between the weapons in world war one and world war two, in world war two we now have the atoimic bomb, also the guns were better and have longer range.
ww1?
yes