The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
This statement mean that the problem or problems came from within the empire (bad government, infighting, crumbling infrastructure, etc.) and not from the outside of the empire. Also there were 8 emperors in the 1st 100 years 29 in the last 100 years. Rome was constantly at civil war with itself while trying to fight of the "barbarians" whom it is really not appropriate to refer to as barbarians as they had control of Rome for the last 50 years or so through puppet emperors. In the end Rome was doomed to fall after Valens waged war on the Goths and Alaric sacked Rome
They did by invading the eastern part of Rome near the Danube River.
the 6th emperor of Rome was Nero
Henry wanted a sonHenry had fallen in loveHenry was short of monetHenry did not like the church being ruled from rome@no copyrighting@BY JITHIN ABRAHAM HEREFORD^ wrong, :p you fail jithin Abraham ...
The Tiber River flows through Rome.
Not necessarily. Rome fell mainly because of the Great Migration (people from nearby countries referred to as "Barbarians" came into Rome) so Rome suffered financial problems and military issues. Famine began after plague caused by Rome trying to solve financial problems by trade (plague was brought in by fleas on rats on foreign ships). Hope this helped. :)
There were no newspapers in ancient Rome.
Ancient Rome did not have newspapers
Ancient Rome had a great number of problems over the 1,200 years of history. The nature of these problems kept changing over time as Rome's situation changed enormously.
Rome fell because of political problems and disloyalty.
First, the Roman empire was to big to control so the government split it into 3 regions. It was to confusing for the Roman republic so the regions were falling apart slowly. Eventually, each region was taken over by other civilizations surrounding Rome.
The social problems where that Rome was separated by Diocletian
Rome always had problems, right from her beginnings.
Ancient Rome had a great number of problems over the 1,200 years of history. The nature of these problems kept changing over time as Rome's situation changed enormously.
is Italy's geography and mild climate contributed to the growth of Rome
How do i know that is why i searched it
Ancient Rome had many different changing problems over the 1,200 years of her history.