During the Second Crusade (1147-1149), Jerusalem was not captured; in fact, it was already under Christian control, having been taken during the First Crusade in 1099. The Second Crusade aimed to respond to the fall of the County of Edessa in 1144 to Muslim forces. The crusaders, led by figures such as King Louis VII of France and Emperor Conrad III of Germany, faced significant challenges, and their campaign ultimately ended in failure, leading to no significant gains in the Holy Land.
The third crusade happen in Jerusemalum in 1984i've always believed that the third crusade happened in medieval times in/at jerusalem. the crusade was a plan to recapture the Holy lands from the Turks/Muslims. Which it did
it lasted longer
crusaders took too much equipment
One thing is the Wendish war...
During the Crusades, various leaders and armies fought to free Jerusalem, notably including Godfrey of Bouillon, who led the First Crusade and became one of its key figures in capturing the city in 1099. Other prominent leaders included Richard the Lionheart during the Third Crusade, who fought against Saladin, the Muslim leader who recaptured Jerusalem in 1187. The conflict over Jerusalem involved numerous battles and shifts in control between Christian and Muslim forces throughout the Crusades.
When the Second Crusade ended, the European Christians lost control of the Holy Land (Jerusalem).
1st Crusade - Franks took Jerusalem 2nd Crusade - Franks did not take Jerusalem 3rd Crusade - Franks did not take Jerusalem
1st Crusade - Franks took Jerusalem 2nd Crusade - Franks did not take Jerusalem 3rd Crusade - Franks did not take Jerusalem
It was captured by the Israelis in year 1967
Saladin took Jerusalem in the Second Crusade, specifically in October of 1187. In the Third Crusade, Saladin started off in control of Jerusalem and Richard the Lionheart abandoned his marches on Jerusalem upon signing the Treaty of Jaffa. As a result, Saladin never lost control of Jerusalem during the Third Crusade and never had to retake it.
One significant difference between the First Crusade and the Second Crusade is the outcomes. The First Crusade resulted in the capture of Jerusalem by the Christian forces, while the Second Crusade did not achieve its primary objective of recapturing Edessa. Additionally, the First Crusade was more successful and united in its goals, while the Second Crusade faced more challenges and internal conflicts among the Christian leaders.
The main difference between the First Crusade and the Second Crusade is that the Christian forces successfully captured Jerusalem and surrounding lands in the First Crusade and experienced heavy losses in the Second Crusade. Both crusades were formed to reconquer Muslim lands that had been previously Christian and/or Jewish.
JERUSALEM qualifies as a city Christians won during the Fisrt Crusade but later lost to Saladin (in the Second Crusade).
The goal of the Second Crusade was to recapture the city of Edessa in the Holy Land, which had been lost to Muslim forces. It was also intended to reinforce the Kingdom of Jerusalem and secure other Christian territories in the region.
The First Crusade.
the crusade took place in Jerusalem
In Jerusalem.