Defending appeasement can be viewed as a strategy aimed at maintaining peace and stability in Europe during the interwar period, particularly in the face of rising totalitarian regimes. Proponents argue that it allowed time for nations to rearm and prepare for potential conflicts, as well as to avoid another devastating war like World War I. Additionally, appeasement was seen as a way to address legitimate grievances of countries like Germany, potentially leading to diplomatic solutions rather than military confrontations.
appeasement encouraged aggression
the British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain is associated with appeasement
why did France and britiain choose the policy of appeasement
the act of appeasing
Neville Chamberlain
yes
Good or bad didn't matter, appeasement failed to prevent Hitler's ambitions.
Hi bob
Appeasement.
It may have bought them some time, but the war wasn't prevented.
I think L. Berman is the best defending lawyer so far
good good you are the best plaer aha
The idea of appeasing your enemy to keep him at arms length away from you is a good idea in theory to protect yourself. But, enemies do not always stay appeased. Appeasement does not really work if the enemy is not appeased as in the case of Adolf Hitler. He went against every nation that tried the appeasement tactic with him.
Appeasement simply didn't work . . . in fact, appeasement made the situation worse.
yes if you enjoy defending.
AppeasementThe policy of appeasement.
Appeasement is the policy of giving in to the demands of an aggressor to keep the peace.