answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Answer this question…

Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event

User Avatar

Stephany Herman

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why would a historian use a primary source when studying about historical event?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why would a historian use primary source when studying about a historical event?

Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event


What is a primary sourses?

A primary source is something that comes from the time that the history is studying. If a historian is studying the first world war, then letters and diaries writen by soldiers, the uniforms they wore and the weapons that they used are primary sources. If a soldier who fought in the trenches wrote about his memories of the war a long time after the war had finished, it would stil be a primary source.


What kind of source would a historian use to get a firsthand account of a past event?

You would consult a primary source for a first and personal view of an historical event. Primary sources are original materials.


Is a compass a primary source?

No, a compass is not a primary source. A primary source is an original document or object that was created at the time being studied. A compass is a tool used for navigation and does not provide firsthand information about historical events or experiences.


How would a secondary source be beneficial to a historian studying a particular event. and ldquoApex and?

It would eliminate the need for her to evaluate primary sources that have already been analyzed by other historians.


What step must a historian take to evaluate historical evidence?

The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.


Why would a historian use a primary source when studying about historical events?

Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event


What item could serve as a primary source for a historian studying the end of apartheid in South Africa?

A journal written by a black south African describing his experiences with apartheid polices -Apex


Would a story about Persian wars still be a primary source if it were written by a historian?

No, a primary source is a contemporary account. To write it now creates a secondary source.


Is a historian's account of Julius Caesar's victory against Spain a primary or secondary source and why?

A historian's account of Julius Caesar's victory against Spain is a secondary source not a primary source. Secondary sources analyze and explain primary sources. Primary sources are documents or objects that were created during the time being studied.


Would a historian use to get a firsthand account of a past event?

Primary source


What would a historian use to get a firsthand account of a past event?

Primary source