Answer this question…
Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
You would consult a primary source for a first and personal view of an historical event. Primary sources are original materials.
An essay about China's first emperor written by a university professor
It important to know what a primary and secondary source is because it helps us destinguish a source that happended during the event and a source that the auther wrote from other sourceses that he/she read.
Primary sources (in history) are things such as documents produced at the time. A secondary source is something written later by a historian. Good examples of primary source documents are legal notices, letters, diaries, newspapers, maps, flags, important documents, clothes, and even furniture.
Primary source analysis
Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
A primary source is something that comes from the time that the history is studying. If a historian is studying the first world war, then letters and diaries writen by soldiers, the uniforms they wore and the weapons that they used are primary sources. If a soldier who fought in the trenches wrote about his memories of the war a long time after the war had finished, it would stil be a primary source.
You would consult a primary source for a first and personal view of an historical event. Primary sources are original materials.
No, a compass is not a primary source. A primary source is an original document or object that was created at the time being studied. A compass is a tool used for navigation and does not provide firsthand information about historical events or experiences.
It would eliminate the need for her to evaluate primary sources that have already been analyzed by other historians.
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
A journal written by a black south African describing his experiences with apartheid polices -Apex
Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
No, a primary source is a contemporary account. To write it now creates a secondary source.
A historian's account of Julius Caesar's victory against Spain is a secondary source not a primary source. Secondary sources analyze and explain primary sources. Primary sources are documents or objects that were created during the time being studied.
Primary source
Primary source