Minors can be held liable for torts, but the extent of their liability often depends on their age and the nature of the act. Generally, courts consider whether the minor had the capacity to understand the consequences of their actions. In some cases, parents may also be held liable for the torts committed by their children, particularly if negligence is involved. However, the rules can vary significantly by jurisdiction.
i don't know ! haha
Torts and contracts are usually between individuals, and not the individual and state with reference to crime. Parties to a contract and torts are liable in case of a breach and the government is only liable when it comes to the laws that have been set up to govern torts and contracts.
In general, parents can be held liable for their children's intentional torts if they were negligent in supervising their child or if they contributed to the harm in some way. However, the extent of parental liability can vary depending on the circumstances and the laws of the specific jurisdiction.
An employer can be vicariously liable for the torts committed by an employee while they are in the scope of their employment in certain situations. An employer will not normally be held vicariously liable for the torts of an independent contractor because of a lack of supervisory control.
Vicarious liability or "respondeat superior."
There are three main types of torts: negligence, intentional torts, and strict liability torts. Negligence occurs when someone fails to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another person. Intentional torts involve deliberate actions that cause harm, such as assault or defamation. Strict liability torts apply when harm is caused by a particular activity or product, regardless of fault.
Yes, minors can be held liable for the reasonable cost of necessaries, which are basic essentials such as food, clothing, and shelter. While minors generally lack the capacity to enter into contracts, they can be required to pay for necessaries they receive, as society recognizes the importance of ensuring that their basic needs are met. This liability is typically limited to reasonable amounts and is intended to protect the welfare of minors. However, the specifics can vary by jurisdiction.
No one is liable for the supply of necessaries to a minor. Only minors estate is liable.United StatesIn the United States the parents are required to provide necessities of life to their minor child.
Yes, a principal contractor can be vicariously liable for the actions of his subcontractor if the subcontractor is found to be an agent of the principal contractor. This typically occurs if the subcontractor is under the direct control or supervision of the principal contractor in carrying out the work.
That depends on the local laws. In cases of necessities they can usually be held accountable. If it is not a necessity, the agreement could be voided.
Minors can be held liable for trespassing the same way adults can. Parents or guardians may also be held responsible for the actions of minors in some cases. It's important to understand that minors can face legal consequences if they are found trespassing on private property.
John G. Fleming has written: 'Supplement to The Law of Torts' -- subject(s): Torts 'Fleming's the law of torts' -- subject(s): Torts 'An Introduction to the Law of Torts (Clarendon Law)' 'An introduction to the law of torts' -- subject(s): Torts 'The solicitor and the disappointed beneficiary'