Lots
Scientists name animals according to their structural framework. Invertebrates are separated with vertebrates. Scientists name animals depending on their genus & what kind of specie they are.
Because people kept finding their fossilized bones as well as complete animals frozen in the permafrost of Siberia. There aren't any of those animals living now so they must be extinct.
this is a very good topic to talk about I think that if animals that are pets they might become mean and visious and they might become very sad and depressed. but if the animal is exotic they should be kept in a cage. like a zoo. that would be a good thing. so I'm agreeing to both.
No there are not any animals that have not been named. When people find them, they should be named...I think! No there are not any animals that have not been named. When people find them, they should be named...I think!
wild mammals should not be held in captivity because if the whales are in the aquariams, they bang their heads against the walls out of boredom and limmit to swimming. an example is the star of free willy had a teeth disease and a problem with his dorsal fin.
I think that animals should be with families that love and care for them. Not tested on or possibly put in cold, little cages.
i think maybe because it's sad
I think it is cruel however if the animals is hurt no
I think that it is good for animals to be kept in zoos if they are endangered also if they need special care or treatment it can be dangerous to keep animals in cages as we;lkie bum
In some cases, it is for the animals protection. For example, if they have caught a tiger that they wish to move to a safer habitat, having the tiger in a cage makes it safe for both the animal and people. Or if it is injured, and should be kept still as possible for healing purposes, it is better they have a confined area. But this should not be for the rest of the animals life. Animals were never meant to be in cages, they were meant to live on earth as humans are. i completely disagree i think animals should run free without fences or people live a life freedom
Yes, unbelievably there are. 1st and only reason: profit and proof. Scientists develop a product. To make sure it works, they test it on animals. If it does, they get the money. Without animals, they have no proof their product works and we won't have any medicine, cosmetics, or drugs. What about the Animals? Left in little cages to die. Animals do not benefit from this at all. Shouldn't they get the profit? Isn't the productt going to be sold to humans? Not Animals? Think about it.
Steps:1.Think of some reasons2.Plan it on your paper3.Edit it4.Write it
They sometimes put the animals in small cages which doesn't allow them much space to move around. In some zoo's, people put animals in the circus or a normal zoo show and whip the animals to make them do tricks.
I think you mean "can animals multiply".. well no, scientists have not yet discovered whether or not animals can perform arithmetic, but yes, they can reproduce, if that's what you meant.
no there isn't but we as scientists think there should be
NO
No, they should not it is cruel and insensitive. I think that the people who think animalsshould be tested upon should take the animals place. If the animals are forced so should the people who force them.