0
Transitional fossils are important because they are visual evidence of one type of animal evolving into another type of animal. A transitional fossil always contains features of one type and features of another.
For example, Archaeopteryx is a transitional fossil that is a cross between a dinosaur and a bird. It has a bony tail, teeth, and claws like a dinosaur, but it has feathers and is able to fly like a bird. It is an important link in the evolution from dinosaurs to birds.
Jaime Anderson
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoTransitional fossils are important because they are visual evidence of one type of animal evolving into another type of animal. A transitional fossil always contains features of one type and features of another.
For example, Archaeopteryx is a transitional fossil that is a cross between a dinosaur and a bird. It has a bony tail, teeth, and claws like a dinosaur, but it has feathers and is able to fly like a bird. It is an important link in the evolution from dinosaurs to birds.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoThis is a very tentative list of transitional fossils. As new fossils are discovered and more is learned about the ones we have, this list is very likely to change, as the fossil record is far from complete, and far from producing a seamless lineage from one group to the next.
Remember that transitional fossils display features of two types of animals and are examples of the transition from one type of animal into another. They serve to "bridge the gap" in evolutionary history between two types of related animals. They can be identified by their retention of certain primitive traits in comparison with their more derived relatives.
Below is just a brief list containing a few examples of transitional fossils for each milestone in the development of life. Ideally, this list would only recursively include "true" transitionals, fossils representing ancestral specie from which later groups evolved. But due to the incomplete nature of the fossil record, most, if not all, of the fossils listed here represent extinct side branches, more or less closely related to the true ancestor. If you are interested in a certain group there is free information online where you can find the full list of transitional forms.
They are listed in transitional order. For example, Pikaia was the most invertebrate-like and Guiyu was the most fish-like.
Invertebrates to fish
These transitional forms had notochords and gills but were jawless:
Pikaia
Conodont
Haikouicthys
Arandaspis
Berkenia
Guiyu
Fish to tetrapods
These fossils display a mosaic of fish-like and amphibian-like features:
Osteolepis
Eusthenopteron
Pandericthys
Tiktaalik
Elginerpeton
Ventastega
Acanthostega
Icthyostega
Hynerpeton
Tulerpeton
Pederpes
Eryops
Labyrinthodonts to Modern Amphibians
They show archaic amphibian features and modern amphibian features:
Gerobatrachus
Triadobatrachus
Prosalirus
Viaraella
Eocaecilia
Amphibians to amniotes
These show features of early reptiles:
Proterogyrinus
Limnoscelis
Tseajaia
Westlothiana
Solenodonsaurus
Casineria
Hylonomus
Paleothyris
Synapsids to mammals
These show the transition from "mammal-like" reptiles to modern mammals:
Protoclepsydrops
Archaeothyris
Clepsydrops
Dimetrodon
Procynosuchus
Diictodon
Thrinaxodon
Cynognathus
Morganucodon
Yanoconodon
Archosaurs to dinosaurs
These reptiles had hips that were less sprawled and walked more upright:
Euparkeria
Proterosuchus
Postosuchus
Marasuchus
Asilisaurus
Spondylosoma
Eoraptor
Dinosaurs to birds
These had feathers but retained some reptile-like characteristics:
Pedopenna
Anchiornis
Scansoriopteryx
Sinornithosaurus
Microraptor
Archaeopteryx
Confuciusornis
Eoalulavis
Ichthyornis
Early artiodactyls to whales
These fossils show a progression from land mammals to modern whales:
Pakicetus
Ambulocetus
Kutchicetus
Artiocetus
Dorudon
Aetiocetus
Basilosaurus
Eurhinodelphis
Mammalodon
Early perissodactyls to modern horses
The ancestors of horses were small, with no hooves, but gradually grew larger:
Hyracotherium
Mesohippus
Parahippus
Merychippus
Pliohippus
Equus
Early primates to modern humans
They show the transition from early primates to great apes to early hominids:
Apidium
Aegyptopithecus
Pierolapithecus
Proconsul
Ardipithecus
Australopithecus
Homo habilis
Homo erectus
Homo sapiens (archaic subspecies)
Homo sapiens
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoWhales.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are fossils examples of organic matter and why?
Yes they are, they have DNA in them and DNA is organic
What is the importance of index fossils?
Index fossils are the fossils of short-lived species which, because of their short lives, can be used by scientists to identify the age of the rock strata in which they're found. (For example, if you know a certain species only lived in the Cambrian period, and you find some fossils of this species in some rock, then you know the other fossils you find in that rock must also have come from the Cambrian period.) Some examples of species that left behind index fossils, and their related historical periods, are:Billingsella corrugagta - Cambrian period, Palaeozoic eraCactocrinus multibrachiatus - Mississippian period, Palaeozoic eraScaphites hippocrepia - Cretaceous period, Mesozoic eraNeptunea tabulata - Quarternary period, Cenozoic eraSee the links below for more examples and info.
What do fossilized tracks tell you about the reptiles that once lived in the canyon?
Well, the tracks are examples of trace fossils. Trace fossils are not fossils in the traditional sense. Instead, they are fossils of something other than the animal or plant's form, like a animal track or burrow, that tells us an animal has been there.
Mummified animals found in dry caves can be examples of fossils with?
i'm not sure but i think it's original preservation.
What do fossils feel like?
Fossils have layer upon layer of hardened tissue. Therefore they are quite rough in texture where the insides are more malleable. Depending on what the fossil is of some fossils give off a sour aroma. Most of the time animal fossils deteriate at a faster rate than fossils of humans or shells. Fossils are a unique study and I you study them further.
What are transitional forms?
Fossils or organisms that show the intermediate states between an ancestral form and that of its descendants are referred to as transitional forms. There are numerous examples of transitional forms in the fossil record, providing an abundance of evidence for change over time.
What is transitional marker?
Transitional markers are words used when writing that connect other words and create a nice flow. Some examples of transitional markers would be and, but, or and if.
What are some examples of words used to contrast statements?
Some examples of transitional words used to contrast statements are:butoryetstillratherthoughinsteadhoweverotherwiseconverselyalternativelynonethelessneverthelessnotwithstanding
What are non examples of fossils?
Some examples of non examples of fossils are as follows: knobby rocks, beautiful stones, bones. All fossils are rocks, and if bone fossils are found they will be much heavier than normal bone.
What are some non-examples of fossils?
Non-examples of fossils can include but not limited to:•A seashell found on the beach•A piece of driftwood•A footprint that your dog left yesterday
What two types of structures do transitional fossils show?
devried traits and ancestral traits
How do plants fit in the evolutionary tree and why aren't there more transitional fossils?
Evolution is NOT real!
What are some examples for index fossils that begin with the letter T?
trilobites
What are some examples of non fossils?
Non-examples of fossils can include but not limited to:•A seashell found on the beach•A piece of driftwood•A footprint that your dog left yesterday
Ano ang examples ng transitional devices?
ibat ibang uri ng transitional divices
Finally next and meanwhile are examples of what kind of words?
They are examples of transitional words.
What is the relationship between fossils and extinction events?
Fossils that show intermediate characteristics are generally called transitional fossils. Transitional fossils are fossils that have characteristics that are intermediate in nature to organisms that existed both prior to it and after it. As such, transitional fossils are strongly suggestive of evolution. There are many examples of transitional fossils in the fossil record. Examples include large-scale transitions such as from reptiles to birds (like the controversial archaeopteryx) and from reptiles to mammals, as well as more detailed transitions, such as those among the many hominids or the development of horses. The fact that, despite the rarity of fossilization, we have a wealth of transitional fossil data and that the fossil data generally conforms to the phylogenetic tree is strongly supportive of the idea of evolution. Mention transitional fossils to a creationist and you will most likely get a dirty look. Transitional fossils are frequently misunderstood, and like macroevolution, creationists tend to redefine the term to suit their purposes. As explained above, transitional fossils are fossils that have characteristics that are intermediate between other organisms. If the transitional fossil can be dated to a time between the organisms it is an intermediate to, it is strongly suggestive of an evolutionary relationship between the organisms. Creationists will critique transitional fossils in a variety of ways. They might claim that a transitional fossil is not proof of an evolutionary relationship since you can't prove that it is, in fact, an ancestor of any later organism. They are right. We can't prove that. As has been explained, transitional fossils are suggestive of an evolutionary relationship - they are not proof of it. Once again we run into problems with creationists looking for proof when science deals rather with supporting evidence. Without actually going back in time and watching the birth/hatching/etc. of each successive organism in an evolutionary chain, we can not "prove" that an evolutionary relationship exists. Even if you accept evolution, you can't be sure some organism is actually an ancestor of existing species - it might be a side-branch on the evolutionary tree that died out. However, transitional fossils are just one more piece of evidence that is suggestive and supportive of evolution. Even if a transitional fossil is a side-branch, it still shows that creatures with intermediate characteristics existed, and this indicates the strong possibility that a similar organism could exist that is an ancestor of an existing species. When you consider that such transitionals fall into the phylogenetic tree well within the area you would expect them to, it is a nicely verified prediction of the general theory of evolution and further support for the theory. Creationists will also sometimes state that a transitional fossil is not, in fact, a transitional. For example, with archaeopteryx, some have claimed that it is not a transitional between reptiles and birds and instead assert that it is a true bird. Unfortunately, this is another example of a creationist lie or distortion. If you look at the evidence it is clear that archaeopteryx has characteristics in common with reptiles that modern birds do not posses. Archaeopteryx is a transitional fossil. We can't say for sure it is actually an ancestor of modern birds, but as explained, that is not a significant issue. In general, creationist arguments that transitionals are not real transitionals are based on their ignorance of what a transitional fossil is or simply on outright distortions of fact. It is not that there isn't room for debate on the nature or categorization of various fossils, because there is always room for debate. However, creationist debates are almost never informed debate and as such do not accomplish much. Finally, creationists will sometimes belabor the fact that there are gaps in the fossil record. Even if we have a transitional fossil between two groups of organisms that is suggestive of an evolutionary relationship, creationists will demand intermediaries between the intermediaries. And, if those are found, creationists will want intermediaries between the new organisms. It's a no-win situation. Since creationists try to put forth the strawman that you need "absolute proof" of an evolutionary relationship to accept it, they insist that if we do not have a record of every single organism in the chain we can't say some organism is an ancestor of another. This is a useless and spurious criticism. I have already shown how we cannot say for certain that any particular fossilized organism was definitively in the evolutionary history of any other organism. But that doesn't matter. The fossil record is still extraodinarily suggestive of evolution in general, and specific fossils are suggestive of evolutionary relationships between specific organisms. We can make very well informed, provisional conclusions (this is science) as to the evolutionary history of many organisms. And these conclusions are supported by the evidence; in many cases by both fossil and nonfossil evidence
