He said that as giraffe stretching out their necks get longer and longer
Certain species, and how they differed from one island to another; in this case, specifically, finches and tortoises.
All organisms are adapted to their environment to a greater or lesser extent. If the abiotic and biotic factors within a habitat are capable of supporting a particular species in one geographic area, then one might assume that the same species would be found in a similar habitat in a similar geographic area, e.g. in Africa and South America. This is not the case. Plant and animal species are discontinuously distributed throughout the world
No. Some form of a scrotum is present when a bull calf is born, regardless if the testes haven't descended yet. It may appear as such if this is the case, but there is a scrotum or "cod" present when a bull calf is born.
John Scopes was a teacher known for being tried for teaching evolution to his students. During his trial, known as the Scopes trial, he contended that evolution should be allowed to be taught, but was ultimately found guilty.
Co-evolution is a different thing for example: A flower has one access to its sugars and only a certain butterfly can get it in there, there for the butterfly will pollinate the flower and the butterfly will get its sugar ;) So evolution "created" a cooperation between the two organisms, this is called co-evolution, you could say that they evolved in one way, they're partners. I hope I am clear if I explain it like this..Adaption is a result of natural selection, if rabbits with a thicker fur have an evolutionary advantage and so have a higher relative fitness, then after a while a bigger and bigger part of the rabbit population will have thicker furs.
Darwin gathered evidence for evolution through observations during his travels, especially to the Galapagos Islands where he studied differences among the finches. He also analyzed fossils and conducted experiments on selective breeding of plants and animals to support his theory of natural selection. Additionally, he corresponded with other scientists and collected data from various sources to build a comprehensive case for evolution.
When you say a statement that includes evidence, your lawyer will then present the evidence to the jury.
H.G. Wells was a proponent of Darwin's theory of evolution. In his works, Wells often referenced evolution and the idea of human progress through natural selection. He was known to support and popularize Darwin's ideas in his writing.
The process of discovery in court is where the government present its evidence to the defense, and vice versa.
Yes, Charles Darwin was right. His theory of Evolution by Natural Selection is the most important theory in the whole of biology. This can come as a surprise to students entering University to study biology if they have been brought up in a soft school soother of 'Oh well, Creation or Evolution, like them or hate them, we don't really know' which might occur if the school is too scared to teach Evolution for fear of a sudden court case. It so happens that "Nothing makes sense in biology except in the light of Evolution" as Theodosius Dobzhansky uttered. We definitely know that evolution occurs, life is variable and thus there is variety for Natural Selection to mould. Life proceeds by Natural Selection. The biodiversity of life on the planet is all due to evolution, at any point in time, from the 10 000 species of flatworm to the 50 000 species of extinct trilobite to the possibly 30 million species of insect. There is absolutely no doubt in the minds of biologists (and physicists and chemists and geologists and cosmologists) worldwide that evolution occurs. There is much evidence. There is much debate too, but not about whether Evolution in general is true or not. Evolution is correct. What is debated is whether Sexual Selection is a subset of Natural Selection or something slightly different (I think it is a subset). Another debate is whether a species can survive unchanged from the Cambrian to the present, like lampshells (I doubt it: present lamp shells should at the very least be different species or genera from their Cambrian ancestors). And countless more debates rage excitingly through the scientific community. But everyone who knows biology from a bar of soap knows that Darwin was correct. More correctly, the evidence shows (regardless of the adherents to the theory) that Darwin was right.
First they ask the judge , then they just present it!
The Scopes Trial In 1925 (monkey trial) Tennessee Trial. Bryan Representing The Parties Against The Darwin Theory Of Evolution. Darrow For Evolution.
Darwin's original theory was formulated over 150 years ago. The modern theory of evolution, while still basically the same as Darwin's, is also significantly different. In either case, there is no scientific alternative to the origin of biodiversity.This is equivalent to how there is no scientific alternative to Atomic Theory.
A case briefing is a summerization of all the evidence present in a court case. This allows lawyers to be able to plan a strategy on how to win or attack a defendent.
In Case 4 of Phoenix Wright: Justice for All, when given the chance to present evidence during Edgeworth's questioning, you should present the "Autopsy Report." This report is crucial as it reveals the time of death, which contradicts the prosecution's claims and supports your defense. By presenting this evidence, you can demonstrate a significant inconsistency that favors your case.
Molecular genetics
Yes, both the prosecution and the defense present evidence in a trial. The prosecution presents evidence to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, while the defense presents evidence to create doubt or support the defendant's innocence. Both sides have the opportunity to call witnesses, introduce documents or physical evidence, and present arguments to support their case.