No. There is no real evidence about that
You can easily refute the theory of evolution--just as easily as you can refute Newton's theory of gravity, or Einstein's theory of relativity. You just can't refute these theories using science or evidence with ease, as these theories are extremely well supported. If you could confirm the existence of fossil bunnies in undisturbed Cambrian strata, that would serve as excellent evidence of a fundamental flaw in Darwin's theory. If you could find a natural specie such as Kirk Cameron's crocaduck, evolution could not explain such a chimera, and forces at odds with Darwin's theory would obviously be at play.
Morphological evidence.Genetic and genomic evidence.Geographical evidence.
Not well supported by the evidence and basically just assertion. Lamarck asserted that acquired characteristics, such as muscles developed during one's lifetime, were heritable. They are not. He also asserted that an organism had a " desire " to evolve. This was also not true.
its not a theory its a fact
Fossils support his hypothesis.
There was no evidence to prove it
plate tectonics
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
why did other scientist not accpet Alfred Wegeners theory
A theory
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
Albert Einstein supported the theory of evolution and believed in the scientific evidence that supported it.
Yes, a theory should be supported by evidence in order to be considered valid and credible. Evidence helps to substantiate the claims and predictions made by a theory, allowing for testing, verification, and refinement of the theory as needed.
rekmr
A theory becomes a fact when that theory is supported by experimental evidence.
The theory of evolution is not supported by incontrovertible evidence.