A tiger is considered a secondary consumer because it primarily feeds on herbivores, such as deer and boars, which are primary consumers that consume plants. In the food chain, primary consumers obtain their energy directly from plants, while secondary consumers obtain their energy by consuming primary consumers. Tigers are positioned at a higher trophic level in the food chain due to their consumption of primary consumers, making them secondary consumers in the ecosystem.
No, the tiger is a consumer, a secondary consumer in the food chain. Composer is not a trophic position on a food chain. Organisms are either producers, consumers or decomposers.
secondary consumer
A primary consumer eats the producer, a secondary consumer eats the primary consumer. For example grass (producer) is eaten by rabbits (primary consumer) who are eaten by foxes (secondary consumer).
It is a secondary consumer, it eats rodents and insects which are mostly primary consumers.
it is a secondary consumer
no, a tiger is a tertiary consumer, because it eats secondary consumers which eat animals that eat plants.
a Siberian tiger is obviously a consumer. It is a secondary consumer. Why would it be a producer if it doesn't produce anything.
It eats, it's a consumer. Only plants are producers and decomposes are bugs that eat dead animals.
No, the tiger is a consumer, a secondary consumer in the food chain. Composer is not a trophic position on a food chain. Organisms are either producers, consumers or decomposers.
They are normally considered a secondary consumer.
No its a Secondary Consumer
Secondary consumer
yes, its not a separate species, just a color morph.
A Snake is a Secondary Consumer
It is a secondary consumer.
they are secondary consumer
Secondary