no, a tiger is a tertiary consumer, because it eats secondary consumers which eat animals that eat plants.
a Siberian tiger is obviously a consumer. It is a secondary consumer. Why would it be a producer if it doesn't produce anything.
It eats, it's a consumer. Only plants are producers and decomposes are bugs that eat dead animals.
No, the tiger is a consumer, a secondary consumer in the food chain. Composer is not a trophic position on a food chain. Organisms are either producers, consumers or decomposers.
They are normally considered a secondary consumer.
yes, its not a separate species, just a color morph.
No its a Secondary Consumer
Secondary consumer
well becuase usually in a food chain or food web you have the secondary that eats the primary (ex. deer eating grass) and then you have the tertiary eating the secondary (ex. tiger eating a deer).
A Snake is a Secondary Consumer
they are secondary consumer
It is a secondary consumer.
Secondary