Imagine if George W. Bush became president and changed the laws to suit himself and his friends: more tax for poor people, less tax for rich, torture OK, detention without trial OK, tear up habeas corpus, rip up laws going back to the Magna Carta, say the US Constitution is just a piece of paper. That's the kind of thing that could happen if one of the US citizens governs. If the law governs, you have an opportunity for fair play for everyone.
Of course, the "any one" is problematic. War criminal Bush was about as bad as anyone could be; how about if a good, wise and just person were to rule the land? Would that be more proper than being governed by the law? Take the UK... please!
Lodging or board and lodging
elastic clause
what two factors govern global circulation
because it gives a proper explanation to everything
no proper explanation such a worst one
The plural noun 'citizens' is a common noun, a general word for the native or naturalized members of a state or nation; a general word for the inhabitants of a particular place; a word for any citizens anywhere.A proper noun is the name or title of a specific person, place, or thing; for example, Citizens Bank or The Citizens Commission on Human Rights.
Do what? please ask a proper question.
No, because it is n ot a proper nou n.
Yes, Social Security is a proper noun, it is the name of a government agency and a citizens' insurance program.
Either is correct. Please, may I have some more? May I have some more, please?
Answer it please!
Please ask this again in proper grammar.