answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Imagine if George W. Bush became president and changed the laws to suit himself and his friends: more tax for poor people, less tax for rich, torture OK, detention without trial OK, tear up habeas corpus, rip up laws going back to the Magna Carta, say the US Constitution is just a piece of paper. That's the kind of thing that could happen if one of the US citizens governs. If the law governs, you have an opportunity for fair play for everyone.

Of course, the "any one" is problematic. War criminal Bush was about as bad as anyone could be; how about if a good, wise and just person were to rule the land? Would that be more proper than being governed by the law? Take the UK... please!

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Can any one please give you a proper explanation of this line- it is more proper that law should govern than any one of the citizens?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp