Using butter means that the cake will turn out exactly as the person who designed the recipe intended. Using oleo spread should still mean that the cake turns out in a relatively similar way, possibly with a slightly different taste. However, spreads and margarines contain a higher water content than butter, which means you need to remove some liquid from the rest of the recipe in order that the batter is the correct consistency before baking.
I should also point out that any kinds of spreads/margarines should not be used for "buttercream icing" or similar, since they tend to leave a cloying/oily film on the tongue in a way which butter does not.
Yes so equal measures
yes
Yes.
I think yes. I interchange different fats in all my baking and cooking, with out incident. I never use butter any more at all, in all my baking and cooking, only real margarine in place of it. the only thing that suffers for lack of taste i feel is gravy.
Real butter can be used instead of imitation butter flavoring. Imitation butter flavoring is typically used instead of real butter when people have health issues that make the consumption of butter bad for them.
During World War II rationing, clever substitutions were made for food products that were scarce. Kraft boxed macaroni and cheese was used as a substitute for meat. Oleo margarine was substituted for real butter, and a combination of chicory and syrup were substituted for coffee.
Margarine is a butter substitute. In baking, I do not substitute margarine unless the receipe calls for it such as "1 cup butter or margarine". There are a lot of older receipes that call for butter, and are just plain tastier with the real stuff.
The substitute stepped in to teach the class while the regular teacher was out sick.
There is no substitute for sugar when making butter-cream frosting. However if you use melted chocolate your frosting will still work, it'll just be a little different. Butter-cream frosting cannot be made without sugar. Melted chocolate will not produce a butter-cream frosting, but will produce chocolate spread over a cake.
No fake butter is not better than real butter because real butter contains natural taste, proteins, nutrient. Where as fake butter consist of chemicals and nothing is real in fake butter.
Margarine can be substituted for butter in most cases. Sometimes a recipe states that no substitution is allowed. When the recipe calls for unsalted butter it will change the taste, and then you can use less salt in the recipe and equal out. Butter does have a distinct flavor that is best in cookies, but using margarine won't change the consistency.A bit more:Margarine has a higher water content, so it won't give the same results with many recipes as butter, and can affect both taste and texture. Pie crust and some cookies are good examples of this, also many cake recipes don't allow for substitution.
There are many different brands of real butter.
Yes. The cookie texture will be the same, although the taste will not be as buttery. For a cookie with good flavor like oatmeal cinnamon raisin or chocolate chip, you won't notice the difference. You could also use unsalted butter instead of Crisco if you don't have any health concerns about butter. Butter flavoring works, but is a substitute flavoring, and real butter as an ingredient has better flavor than substitute flavorings.
Macedonio Pena was the real person who invented peanut butter.
If you want a substitute for healthy reasons, I suggest using coconut oil. It's good for you and tastes good. Otherwise, organic's always better!Butter is shortening. It's also a natural product without - in most countries - artificial additives enhancing its flavour or colour, unlike margarine, which cannot be made without various additives.If you must use margarine or oil as shortening your recipe will end up acceptable, provided you check your quantities carefully, but it won't be the same as if it was made with real butter.