I am answering this question with the assumption that it is the murder trials you are asking about.
No, the Fifth Amendment was not violated in these cases. The first trial was a criminal trial in which OJ was acquitted (found not guilty) of the murder charges. The second trial was a civil trial in which the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman sued OJ for wrongful death and battery. OJ was unanimously found guilty of wrongful death and battery against Ronald Goldman and battery against Nicole Brown Simpson. He was ordered to pay 33,500,000.00 in damages.
yes
he was found not giilty he is a water boy for USC
In legal trials the defendent is the person accused, the prosecution has to prove the charges against the defendent. In civil court such as OJ Simpson's wrongful death trial he was the claiment and the plantiff was the Brown and Goldman families.
According to the AP, Simpson's Heisman Trophy was auctioned off at a court ordered auction to pay off the awards of the civil suit won by the Goldman Family against Simpson. The person that won the bid was a gentleman named Tom Kreissman, a sheet metal dealer in Philadelphia. His bid was $255,000.
Although not proven at the criminal trial, it is commonly believed and assumed that O.J. Simpson killed his wife.
The evidence against OJ Simpson was overwhelming, both DNA and other physical and circumstantial. I will list just a few for lack of space. -victims' blood inside OJ Simpson's white Bronco in various places. -glove with victims blood outside OJ Simpson's house on Rockingham. -OJ Simpson's DNA at crime scene -sock with victim's blood at OJS's residence on Rockingham -bloody knife found buried in empty lot in Chicago next to OJS's hotel room where he flew to on the night of the murders. -bloody footprints at crime scene found to be made by expensive Italian designer in same size OJS wears. When claimed he didn't own any of these shoes they were found after a serach warrent was obtained and a search of the house on Rockingham was conducted. -cuts on OJS's hands, claimed he cut it on a glass. -eluded police when he knew arrest was immenent, chase in white Bronco, had guns, --sum of money, threatened to commit suicide. -confessed to cellmate while being held at jail after arrest. -OJS had a history of violence against his ex-wife Like I said, these are just a few of the many pieces of evidence that were presented at the criminal trial. As you can see, the evidence is overwhelming against Mr. Simpson.
Double Jeopardy is a protection from being tried over and over again for the same crime. Without Double Jeopardy protection once a not guilty verdict was reached they could just try the case a second time hoping you were found guilty
The Fifth Amendment provides five protections: the right to a grand jury, protection against double jeopardy, the right against self-incrimination, due process of law before being deprived of life, liberty, or property, and protection against government seizure of private property without just compensation.
The 5th Amendment protects against double jeopardy and self-incrimination
The Bill of Rights is the name granted the first Ten Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. These amendments protects all of the following: freedom of speech, freedom to bear arms for the purpose of a well-regulated militia, the right to privacy in the home in the context of peacetime housing of soldiers and requiring warrants for searches, the right to protection against self-incrimination, the right to a fair trial, and the right to protection against excessive bails and fines, as well as from unusual punishments. The ninth and tenth amendments cover more legalese coverings, mostly that the amendments are not an exhaustive list of all the rights possessed by the people, and that the states have powers as long as they're not delegated to the federal government nor prohibited to the states by the Constitution.
you have the cooties
Consumer protection is essential for a healthy economy. We need Consumer Protection Act for the following:- Physical protection of the consumer. Protection against deceptive and unfair trade practices. Protection against all types of pollution. Protection against the abuse of monopoly position and/or restrictive trade practices. Protection of enjoying the rights.
Chuck Norris. Period.
The Fourteenth Amendment Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses have both been used, but the Due Process Clause has been used more because many amendments in the Bill of Rights relate directly to protection against abuse from the criminal justice system (due process of law).Please note that only the First, Fourth and Sixth Amendments have been fully incorporated; the Fifth Amendment is mostly incorporated; The Third and Eighth Amendments are partially incorporated; the Second and Seventh Amendments are currently unincorporated. The Ninth and Tenth Amendments, while considered part of the Bill of Rights, are not amenable to the process.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
child protection austtralia
the 13th and 14th amendments
Fuses do not provide protection against ground faults. Protection against a ground fault can be provided by breakers. If a fuse blows, it has to be replaced. If a breaker is tripped to off due to a surge in electrical current, the breaker can be reset.
The survival of many species is in jeopardy due to the effects of global warming. Testifying against the mob put the informant's life in jeopardy. The term "double jeopardy" means that you cannot be tried twice for the same crime. I like to watch the game show "Jeopardy" right after watching "Wheel of Fortune."