The actions taken by President Hoover to solve the wall street crash (the depression) were, to give loans to businesses to help them recover. The Reconstruction Finance corporation was developed in 1929 and planned to help companies, it was claimed a success by the businesses it helped. He also bought produce from farmers above the Market rate, this would help the farmers and the agriculture in America. He also $4000 million into a building project, one of it's most famous buildings is the Hoover dam, built in Clark county, Nevada and was built by 1936. The last action I'm going to mention is the Emergency Relief Act (ERA), Hoover provided $300 million to give food and shelter to the less fortunate people. This is the most simplest way of explaining the actions taken by Hoover. Thank you.
not very
very unlikely
They were broken down cars pulled by mules. They were named after President Herbert Hoover because he was blamed for the great depression, and the many homeless. He got blamed because he didn't take any actions to help through the great depression
Because Herbert Hoover was president at the time and the Depression was blamed on him.After President Hoover. Ironic.Hoovervilles and Shantytowns were named after Herbert Hoover because it was Hoover's actions that lead to their creation.
allow voluntary actions to resolve it
he was associated with bank. he did the corruption to make it happy
President Jackson transferred funds out of the Bank of the United States which led to the great depression.
President Jackson transferred funds out of the Bank of the United States which led to the great depression.
Explain how nonverbal actions are considered a form of communicate well?
yes fear can cause depression and effect the brains actions
Roosevelt places a lot of blame on Hoover and his actions (or lack thereof) that lead to the Depression.
roosevelts approach to the great depression was that he was ready to experiment with governments actions to deal with the nations crisis
The president checks the actions of the legislative branch through vetoes on bills passed by Congress.
no it can not be unconstitutional