0
something
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the form of government in Brazil?
Brazil, officially known as the Federative Republic of Brazil, is the fifth largest country in the world. Its type of government is a Presidential system, Federal republic, Constitutional republic.
What form of leadership does Brazil have?
Government type: federal republic
Brazil's form of government?
Brazil's form of government is the federal and the type of Brazil's government is the federate republic.
What is the form of leadership of Russia?
Russia is led by a president, and the form of government is a federal semi-presidential republic.
What is the form of leadership in Russia?
Russia is led by a president, and the form of government is a federal semi-presidential republic.
What form of government is used today in Brazil?
Republic Democracy Vote Presidencial
What Latin American country has a federal republic?
Mexico, Brazil, Argentina and Venezuela have such form of government.
What distinguishes the form of leadership public voting proceduresand personal freedoms the republican system of government in the republic of Kenya the republic of south Africa and the dictatorship?
the dictator
How do you know that Julius Caesar was a republic?
Julius Caesar was not a republic. He was a man. A republic is a form of government.Julius Caesar was not a republic. He was a man. A republic is a form of government.Julius Caesar was not a republic. He was a man. A republic is a form of government.Julius Caesar was not a republic. He was a man. A republic is a form of government.Julius Caesar was not a republic. He was a man. A republic is a form of government.Julius Caesar was not a republic. He was a man. A republic is a form of government.Julius Caesar was not a republic. He was a man. A republic is a form of government.Julius Caesar was not a republic. He was a man. A republic is a form of government.Julius Caesar was not a republic. He was a man. A republic is a form of government.
What is the form of leadership?
what is the form of leadership in Athenians, in the 380 BC?
What country government is the same type as that of the US?
The US has a republic form of government and countries such as France, Italy, Brazil, and India have the same forms.
What is the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman Emperor?
The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.
