The Upper and upper middle class Victorians did not work; they would inherit their money from relatives. If they did have occupations it would be that of business or land owner (ei. an owner of a cotton mill). They would enjoy lavish parties, music and food would be their main enjoyment. Would have a great number of servants. Upstairs maids, parlor maids, ladies maids, valets, butler, coach drivers, groundskeepers, gardeners, cooks, housekeeper, governess and nurse (if they had children). Approx annual income £5000 to 30,000
There were also middle and lower middle class families, these were Doctors, lawyers. They would enjoy some of the same things as the upper class but not to such an extent and would not be involved in as many parties and circles. Would not have as many servants; a cook, house keeper.
Approx annual income £100-1000
The Lower class which was a focal point of Charles Dickens who were hard labour workers, factory hands etc. They either did not have any servants or were servants themselves. Approx income 3s 6d /week.
Samuel De Champlain's family was poor. In fact most of the families in France was poor. I am not from France but I would say that the Catholic churches were rich.
the responsibilities of the rich to the poor are to help the poor and if they have children or are poor; the rich must help them by lending them money, or maybe even give them money to start of with.
the poor are significantly constrained in what they can buy, and what they can do, compared to the rich. This can impair the education, nutrition, health, and general well being of the poor.
the amount of things they had was a big difference also there house was a big different rich had better then the poor
Sojourner was very poor, but her family did good in some ways.
a poor persons house is shared by many families but a rich persons house is a huge building made for one big family and looks very posh
yes it is used by rich and poor children from the Victorian times
What did rich Victorian families eat for dinner and for special functions?
poor
Rich Victorian children often had an opportunity not afforded to poor children. They often received an education while poor children worked in the factories.
clothes hhshshfhshhfds
A diabolo was generally used by rich Victorian children because they had access to toys available in shops.
Children in the Victorian times were most often happy with what they had because they had no comparison. They lived in homes with their families when they were wealthy or in crowded rooming houses if they were not as wealthy. They often had to work with their families in order to make ends meet.
nothing
In big houses, sometimes called mansions.
they had to go to school or they went to work to sweep chimnys
The same way that people are rich today. either by sheer hard work, or inherited.