IF your name is on the TITLE, you go get it. If not on the title, call the lender and make arrangements for them to repo so you can have possession of the car.
Only if you co signed for them and the child is not repaying them. The divorce has nothing to do with your obligation or lack of obligation. Your child certainly has a moral obligation to pay for loans they took out.
No. They can only repossess the power unit they were sent to repossess - they cannot take the trailer. At that point, it's theft. Especially if it's loaded.
If the third child took 8, and the second child took 1 more than half then he took 9, so then that's 17. If the first child took half of the original is 17 were taken by child 2 and 3, then double 17 is 34. So, Child 1 took 17 Child 2 took 9 Child 3 took 8
If you are talking about Federal guaranteed student loans, then the answer is no. Federal collection agencies do not repossess property.
I believe it is the amount you must repay to the company or person you took out the loan from when you were a student. This may stretch for weeks months or even years.
It was supposed to be Jesus. But the Dinosaurs took over.
I believe it is the amount you must repay to the company or person you took out the loan from when you were a student. This may stretch for weeks months or even years.
It took me about 5 hours and 40 minutes.
chiésame fougige
In most instances when you get behind on your payments. The exact details of when the lender will repossess the vehicle is listed in the contract you signed when you took out the loan on the vehicle. Read your contract with the lender.
Why would they NOT be able to repo a car they purchased the title to? READ your contract.
Hire an attorney. If the child is a minor, the money isn't usually just handed over to them, rather it is put in a trust to be given to the child when they reach adulthood or a specified age. If the father took the money that was legally and specifically supposed to go to the child or their support and it's proven the father just whittled it away, he could be held liable to replace those funds.