Although we are not talking about a perfect determination, meaning that other factors in this relationship (the so called intermediate factors) have to be controlled in an ideal model the relationship is as follows:
The original status (the status of witch you start as a result of being born in your family - differences being obvious in this mater if you compare the chances of someone who starts out from a south African family or someone who starts from a north American family) regulates, or influences the type of education you get, which on the other hand regulates or influences the resulted social status.
By the way most social theorist agree that the structure of stratification is according to the concept of class (higher, middle, and lower) these being the categories of stratification as well.
I am going to exemplify this.
Lets say that I am the son of an Bank Manager, I will have the chance, because my dad has the money, he will afford to send me lets say to Harvard, where I will get a degree witch in the other hand is highly valued on the job market and will lend me a good paying job with a good social status.
On the other hand if my dad is an unemployed.... I will have to do with community college, or I will have to start working after high school whitout a degree, no degree no good job, no good job no high salary nor good social status.
This is the main idea, but of course maters are not as simple as they seem, if anybody wants to read more about this subject I recommend an article written by prof. dr. Traian Rotariu a professor of sociology who is interested in the mater of social mobility called The Role of School in Social Mobility.
Social stratification can impact education by creating inequalities in access to quality schools, resources, and opportunities based on social class, race, or gender. Individuals from lower social strata may face barriers such as limited funding for schools, lack of support services, and discrimination. This can result in disparities in academic achievement, with consequences for future opportunities and social mobility.
Education influences social stratification by improving the income for some. Those that are educated have a higher potential income. This increases the gap between high and low income earners.
indeed it is. i is from da west end, and i love da edyoocashon.
Social stratification in the Caribbean is influenced by historical factors such as colonialism and slavery, which created hierarchical structures based on race and class. Economic disparities, limited access to education and healthcare, and political factors also contribute to social stratification in the region. Additionally, cultural norms and traditions can reinforce social divisions and inequalities.
The five basic characteristics of social stratification are: a) Ancient Stratification / The Antiquity of Social stratification b) The Ubiquity of Stratification c) The Social Patterning of Stratification d) The Diversity of Form and Amount of Stratification e) The Consequences of Stratification
Social inequality reflects the social-conflict theorists ideas about social stratification.
For centuries, sociologists have analyzed social stratification, its root causes, and its effects on society. Theorists Karl Marx and Max Weber disagreed about the nature of class, in particular. Other sociologists applied traditional frameworks to stratification.
Stratification refers to a system in which groups of people are divided into layers according to their relative property, prestige, and power.Every society stratifies its members.In every society of the world, gender is a basis for stratifying people. Example of stratification systems; slavery, caste, class.
Social stratification in education can lead to unequal access to resources and opportunities based on factors like income, race, and social class. This can result in disparities in educational achievement, perpetuating a cycle of inequality. Students from marginalized backgrounds may face barriers to success, such as limited access to quality education, resulting in reduced chances for upward mobility.
The five basic characteristics of social stratification are: a) Ancient Stratification / The Antiquity of Social stratification b) The Ubiquity of Stratification c) The Social Patterning of Stratification d) The Diversity of Form and Amount of Stratification e) The Consequences of Stratification
Social stratification in the Caribbean is influenced by historical factors such as colonialism and slavery, which created hierarchical structures based on race and class. Economic disparities, limited access to education and healthcare, and political factors also contribute to social stratification in the region. Additionally, cultural norms and traditions can reinforce social divisions and inequalities.
The key determinants of social stratification are economic, social and political policies.
Some approaches in the study of social stratification include structural functionalism, which focuses on how social institutions contribute to social inequality; conflict theory, which views social stratification as a result of competition for resources; and symbolic interactionism, which emphasizes how individuals' interactions and roles contribute to social hierarchy. These approaches offer different perspectives on how social hierarchies are created and maintained.
The main theoretical perspectives of social stratification are structural-functionalism, which sees stratification as necessary for society to function efficiently; conflict theory, which views stratification as a result of competition for scarce resources; and symbolic interactionism, which emphasizes how individual interactions contribute to the maintenance of stratification. Other perspectives include feminist theory, which examines how gender intersects with stratification, and intersectionality, which considers how multiple social identities interact to shape an individual's position in society.
For centuries, sociologists have analyzed social stratification, its root causes, and its effects on society. Theorists Karl Marx and Max Weber disagreed about the nature of class, in particular. Other sociologists applied traditional frameworks to stratification.
There are some characteristics of social stratification: 1) social (unbiological) - distribution goods in society is based on norms or generally recognized rules; 2) traditionality - social inequality different group of people is saved during all history of human civilization. The common types of social stratification are : economical (the level of wealth and income); political (access to political power); educational (education level); and occupational prestige.
Social inequality reflects the social-conflict theorists ideas about social stratification.
Both the structural-functionalism and social conflict approaches offer valuable insights into social stratification. Structural-functionalism emphasizes how social systems work together to maintain stability and order, while social conflict theory highlights how power dynamics and inequalities contribute to stratification. The choice between the two approaches depends on the specific context being studied and the level of analysis being considered.
The lower classes have the least to gain from social stratification.
n