To my knowledge there hasn't been any real studies on the amount of land destroyed in Vietnam. The reasons possibly because if you are talking about by bombings and the destruction that caused or by the amounts of chemicals we sprayed, such as Agent orange and the other herbicides we used to kill and defoliate the jungle hid aways the enemy used. By the second it is known that most of the land in the south has been affected and in some cases you could even say destroyed because of the contamination from the herbicides.
There isn't really a exact percentage, more of a descriptive term. Most of the land destroyed by B-52s and F-4 Phantom fighter jets were strips of jungle and rice paddy fields. Rice paddy fields were part of the supplies for the opposing Viatnemese, so destroying the fields were effectively cutting off food.Land was destroyed with napalm, which could burn for long periods.
Operation Rolling Thunder
nobody
china controlled much land from vietnam to korea but peninsula country, i dont know! NOW LEAVE ME ALONE!
the US spend 140 billion Dollars on the Vietnam war
Laos may not be as industrialized as Vietnam is; Vietnam learned much from the US.
15663 hectares of land was destroyed during black Saturday.
vietnam covers 127,246 sq mi; 329,566 sq km of land
there hasn't been a eruption in 2008 yet.
Operation Rolling Thunder
different
Depends how large or small the Tornado is.
Bombs and fires destroyed much of London.
Johnson & Nixon.
lots of land was destroyed. along with killing LOTS and LOTS of people. =)
No - most of the SOUTH was
nobody
Land was not destroyed at Pearl Harbor. The bombs destroyed buildings and shore facilities. They sank many ships and destroyed aircraft on the ground. They were unable to destroy the facilities used to repair the ships, which proved a major factor moving forward in the war.