Bernie Sanders has made 1,867 USD in speaking fees, and gave it all to charity. For perspective Hillary and Bill Clinton have made 153 million in combined speaking fees since 2001.
We don't have every speaking fee he has ever received, but by most accounts, he has given no speeches to Wall Street, and in the past year, he earned $1,867.42 in speaking fees; he also made $850 for a TV appearance on the Bill Maher show, "Real Time." Mr. Sanders says that he generally donates all of his speaking fees to charity.
Jimmy initially made his money as an options trader. Since then, he lives off of investments and speaking fees.
$169,000 for 2008. They make the real money in budgets (hiring friends), Speaking fees, and the jobs they get later or books they write etc.
Reverse Mortage Fees (RMF) are basically mortgage fees, backwards! Instead of the bank paying you money, you have to pay the bank money for mortgage. This can be good and bad.
No it does not cost any money to join youtube and their are no hidden fees...
No, there should be no fees. Some scam jobs will want more money for fees.
Can we get funding for legal fees in Indiana and money to pay new mortgage fees?
work. taxes and fees
It does not work that way for about 95% of the Paypal population. Fees are taken out automatically when you RECEIVE a payment. No fees for sending money and/or buying.
Taxes. That is where all governments in America get there money. Along with taxes they get money from the general fees, and fines to the public. Examples are, marriage licenses, (you have to pay for all licenses you get from the gov't) hunting licenses, illegal parking fees, speeding tickets, and general court fees.
== == Cabinet Members get $186,600 per year base pay. This does not include any other perks, per-diem, free flights, speaking fees, etc. http://dcjobsource.com/presidentialsalaries.html
Banks make money from loans in the following ways: * Application fees generated from the review of a loan opportunity * Origination fees generated from the funding of a loan * Finance charges (interest) generated from the interest rate associated with the loan * Late fees generated from borrowers' late payments * Prepayment fees generated from loans that are paid off earlier than the terms agreed to * Documentation or statement fees generated from documents printed and sent to borrowers In addition to making money from loans, banks also make money by investing the depositor's money. They pay a certain interest rate to the depositors, then invest that money in a higher paying interest account than what they pay the depositors. They also make money from fees on checking accounts and overdraft fees when one overdraws on their account.
There is one question that involves Senator Sanders that has seemed to slip under the radar scope of the news media and among other politicians that either support Senator Sanders or that oppose him. Clearly the "main stream" of the Democrat Party leans more towards the policies of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton then those of Senator Sanders. Also, on the Republican side, liberal, moderate and conservative politicians also are on opposite poles then Senator Sanders. With all that said, how can Senator Sanders refer to himself as a socialist? Socialists believe that the major means of production in a democratic socialist nation are owned and controlled by the central government under the name of all the people. Senator Sanders has not proposed one area of the US mixed market economy that he would socialize. With that said, it can be generous to say that the senator "prefers socialism" however, he recognizes that: 1. Very few people in the US are socialists; and 2. No one in either of the major political party has proposed a government takeover of the banking system as an example, simply as a measure to improve the economy and does not claim that such a move would be part of a socialist agenda. Senator Sanders, if he were to be elected to the US presidency would be an advocate of increased social expenditures, such as reduced college fees or free college. This measure would never pass Congress. Senator Sanders believes that increased social programs would be paid for by raising taxes. Yet as it has been pointed out time and time again, that if all the wealth of the top 5% of Americans, would be confiscated to help pay for new programs or to reduce the national debt, this would amount to nothing. Raising it to the top 10% would also not make a dent in the national debt of about $20 trillion. With all of that said, the answer to the original question is that if Senator Sanders was elected to the US presidency, he would be an advocate of increased taxes and more social benefits. There is nothing wrong with that "idea" except that it most likely is not workable.