Legally, none, not one little bit. Yes, technically, none. Or at least none of the copyrighted parts (new creative works). But the copyright owner still has the burden of proof on a number of issues, so a relatively minor infringement isn't going to justify calling out the bus-load of litigators. You may get a somewhat pointed letter that asks you what you think you're doing (or the like) and you should take that as a sign they're warming up the bus. Better safe than sorry, unless you have a lot of time and money to go defend yourself in federal court.
Answer Usually, if 30 seconds or less of a song is used by a website or business, it is considered "sampling" and not copyright infringement. For example, internet and Satellite radio services must pay full royalties to the copyright owners whenever they play a complete song. However, the songs they play as quick promos or clips are not subject to full copyright (and may not have to pay any royalties, depending on the terms of their license). This is why it's legal for I-Tunes to let you listen to 30 seconds of each song before you download it. To be safe, I would only post 30 seconds or less of a song on a public website. It is exceedingly unlikely that the recording companies would come after your for using "sampling" on a website.
Under the Copyright Act, some actions that are typically considered illegal include: Reproducing or copying copyrighted material without permission from the owner, whether it's in physical or digital form. Distributing or sharing copyrighted material without authorization, including uploading or downloading copyrighted content without proper licensing or permission. Modifying or transforming copyrighted works without the consent of the owner, which includes creating derivative works or adaptations without permission. Publicly performing or displaying copyrighted material without authorization, such as playing music or showing movies in a public venue without proper licensing.
Without permission, yes.
No. Public domain means that the material is available for use by anyone, without copyright restriction.
the says how the hears so repeat the content that makes up the statment
There is no such thing as "un-copyright". Something is either copyrighted or not. If it is copyrighted, then the copyright eventually expires, making it public domain.
Submit only videos to YouTube that do not contain material copyrighted by someone else or get the necessary permission before you post.
Her work would be copyrighted.
Works in the public domain are not protected by copyright.
This music in in the public domain. Nothing from 1876 is still in copyright.
It depends on what you're doing with it. Any copyrighted material appearing on film or display in public is protected by copyright law and could be subject to legal action. This also applies to profiting off of said item without permission of the owner of those rights.
No, O. Henry's works are in the public domain since he passed away in 1910, over 100 years ago. This means that anyone can use, publish, or adapt his stories without needing permission or worrying about copyright infringement.
There is one public domain, which is the label assigned to that which is offered to or is available to the public, as opposed to having specific restrictions with regard to use. Copyright limits or forbids the use of a particular work (writing, art, music, theater, poetry, etc.) without permission of the copyright holder. When a copyright expires, the work moves into "public domain," meaning that anyone can use it free of charge and without permission. The works of Shakespeare, for example, public domain.